Advertisement

Risk Methodology for Multimedia Projects Assessments

  • Kjell Stordahl
  • Nils Kristian Elnesgaard
  • Leif Aarthun Ims
  • Borgar Tørre Olsen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1629)

Abstract

The paper describes a methodology for performing quantitative risk analysis of multimedia projects, as developed in the ACTS projects OPTIMUM and TERA. A framework for risk analysis is presented, encompassing key elements such as choice of probability density functions, correlation between important variables, simulation performance, methodology for cost predictions, demand forecasts, tariff predictions and associated uncertainties. The TERA tool for techno-economic evaluation is presented and the important steps in network evaluation identified. The paper examines how much the most critical factors contribute to the overall risk profile of telecommunications operator projects and studies the dependencies between variables.

Keywords

Relative Standard Deviation Relative Uncertainty Demand Forecast IEEE Communication Magazine Delphi Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. P. Wright ≪Factors affecting the cost of airplanes≫ Journal of Aeronautic Science 3(4) 122–128, 1936.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. R. Crawford ≪Learning curve, ship curve, ratios, related data≫.Locheed Aircraft Corporation, 1944.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. E. Yelle ≪The learning curve: Histrorical revew and comprehensive survey≫. Decision Science 10(2) 302–328, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Stordahl, B.T. Olsen, "Demand Elasticity and Forecasts of Wide and Broadband. Service in the Residential Market Based on Results from an International Delphi Survey," 1995 International Communications Forecasting Conference, Toronto, Canada, June 13–16, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. T. Olsen, A. Zaganiaris, K. Stordahl, L.Aa. Ims, D. Myhre, T. Overli, M. Tahkokorpi, I. Welling, M. Drieskens, J. Kraushaar, J. Mononen, M. Lähteenoja, S. Markatos, M. De Bortoli, U. Ferrero, M. Ravera, S. Balzaretti, F. Fleuren, N. Gieschen, M. De Oliveira Duarte, E. de Castro, "Techno-economic evaluation of narrowband and broadband access network alternatives and evolution scenario assessment," IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 14(6), 1996, 1184–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. A. Ims, B. T. Olsen, D. Myhre, J. Mononen, M. Lähteenoja, U. Ferrero, A. Zaganiaris, "Multiservice Access Network Upgrading in Europe: a Techno-economic Analysis,"IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 34, no. 12, Dec. 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. T. Olsen, L.A. Ims, T. Overli, K. Stordahl, D. Myhre, M. Drieskens, J. Kraushaar, M. Tahkokorpi, M. Ravera, M. De Bortoli, A. Zaganiaris, S. Markatos, M. Lähteenoja, J. Mononen, F. Fleuren, "PNO and Cable Operator broadband upgrade technology alternatives: a techno-economic analysis," in Proc. Optical Fiber Conference 1996 (OFC `96), Feb. 25–March 1, 1996, San Jose, USA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. T. Olsen, L.A. Ims, D. Myhre, K. Stordahl, R. Theivindrein: "Technoeconomic Evaluation of Optical Broadband Access Network Scenarios for the residential and business market," In Proc. 21st European Conference on Optical Communications 1995 (ECOC `95), Brussells, Belgium, September 14–17, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Saijonmaa, M. Tahkokorpi, I. Welling, "Cost of Investment and Revenue Modelling and Analysis of Various Networked Multimedia Services in PTO and Cable Operator Environments," in Proc. TELECOM `95, Technology Summit, vol. 2 pp 629–633, Oct, 3–11, 1995, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Stordahl, L.A. Ims, B.T. Olsen, "Risk assessment and techno-economic analysis of competition between PNO and Cable operators," In Proc. Networks `96, 6th International Workshop on Optical Access Networks, Sydney, Australia, November 25–29, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ims L A, K Stordahl, B.T. Olsen ≪Risk analysis of residential broadband upgrade in a competitive environment≫ IEEE Communications Magazine June 1997Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Luck, "Broadband To The Home: Evolution Scenarios for Australia," In Proc. 13th Annual Conference European Fibre Optic Communications and Networks, EFOC&N’ 95, June 27–30, 1995, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stordahl, K, Murphy, K "Methods for forecasting long term demand for wide and broadband services in the residential market," IEEE Communications magazine, 13,(2), 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Pugh, G. Boyer, "Broadband Access: Comparing Alternatives," IEEE Communications Magazine 5, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stordahl K, L Rand "Long term forecasts for broadband demand". Telektronikk no2, 1999Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. A. Ims, D. Myhre, B.T. Olsen, K. Stordahl, A. Ruiz-Cantera, B. Jacobs, B. Rose, M. C. Combes, J. Mononen, M. Lähteenoja, L. Budry, M. Salerno, U. Ferrero, V. Benedetto, D. Collins, "Economics of broadband access network upgrade strategies: the European perspective", In Proc. OHAN’ 98, Sydney, Australia, Nov 8–12, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjell Stordahl
    • 1
  • Nils Kristian Elnesgaard
    • 2
  • Leif Aarthun Ims
    • 3
  • Borgar Tørre Olsen
    • 3
  1. 1.Telenor NettOsloNorway
  2. 2.TeleDanmark, Research and DevelopmentTåstrupDenmark
  3. 3.Telenor, Research and DevelopmentKjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations