Skip to main content

Bounded Contraction in Systems with Linearity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1617))

Abstract

The aim of this work is to perform a proof-theoretical investigation of some propositional logics underlying either finite-valued Gödel logic or finite-valued Łukasiewicz logic. We define cut-free hypersequent calculi for logics obtained by adding either the n-contraction law or the n-weak law of excluded middle to afine intuitionistic linear logic with the linearity axiom (AB) ⋁ (BA). We also develop cut-free calculi for the classical counterparts of these logics. Moreover we define a hypersequent calculus for Ł3⋂ Ł4 in which the cut-elimination theorem holds. This calculus allows to define an alternative axiomatization of Ł4 making no use of the Lukasiewicz axiom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Avron. A constructive analysis of RM. J. of Symbolic Logic, vol. 52. pp. 939–951. 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Avron. Natural 3-valued Logics. Characterization and Proof Theory. J. of Symbolic Logic, vol. 56. pp. 276–294. 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Avron. Hypersequents, Logical Consequence and Intermediate Logics for Concurrency. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4. pp. 225–248. 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Avron. The Method of Hypersequents in the Proof Theory of Propositional Nonclassical Logics. In: Logic: from Foundations to Applications. W. Hodges, M. Hyland, C. Steinhorn and J. Truss Eds., European Logic Colloquium. Oxford Science Publications. Clarendon Press. Oxford. pp. 1–32. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Avron. Two Types of Multiple-Conclusion Systems. Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 6(5). pp. 695–717. 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Baaz, A. Ciabattoni, C.G. Fermüller, H. Veith. Proof Theory of Fuzzy Logics: Urquhart’s C and Related Logics. Prooceedings of MFCS’98. Lectures Notes in Computer Science. vol.1450. pp.203–212. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ciabattoni, D.M. Gabbay, N. Olivetti. Cut-free Proof Systems for Logics of Weak Excluded Middle. Soft Computing. vol. 2(4). To appear. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Cignoli, D. Mundici, I.M.L. D’Ottaviano. Algebraic foundations of many-valued reasoning. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.Y. Girard. Linear Logic. Theoretical Comp. Science, vol. 50. pp. 1–102. 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Grigolia. Algebraic analysis of Łukasiewicz-Tarski n-valued logical systems. In Selected Papers on Łukasiewicz Sentential Calculi. R. Wòjciki and G. Malinowski Ed., Polish Acad. of Sciences, Ossolineum, Wrocław. pp. 81–91. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Hájek. Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. Höhle. Commutative, residuated l-monoids. In: Nonclassical logics and their applications to fuzzy subsets. U. Höhle and P. Klement Eds., Kluwer. Dordrecht. pp. 53–106. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Hori, H. Ono, H. Schellinx. Extending Intuitionistic Linear Logic with Knotted Structural Rules. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. vol. 35(2). pp. 219–242. 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Ono. Logics without contraction rule and residuated lattices. Draft. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Ono, Y. Komori. Logics without the contraction rule. J. of Symbolic Logic, vol. 50. pp.169–201. 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Prijatelj. Bounded Contraction and Gentzen style Formulation of Łukasiewicz Logics. Studia Logica, vol. 57. pp. 437–456. 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Prijatelj. Connectification for n-contraction. Studia Logica, vol. 54(2). pp. 149–171. 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. A.S. Troelstra. Lectures on Linear Logic. CSLI Lectures Notes n.29. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ciabattoni, A. (1999). Bounded Contraction in Systems with Linearity. In: Murray, N.V. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1617. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48754-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48754-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66086-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48754-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics