Skip to main content

Avoiding Non-Ground Variables

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1638))

Abstract

For many reasoning tasks in Artificial Intelligence, it is much simpler (or even essential) to deal with ground inferences rather than with inferences comprising variables. The usual approach to guarantee ground inferences is to introduce means for enumerating the underlying Herbrand-universe so that during subsequent inferences variables become bound in turn to the respective Herbrand-terms. The inherent problem with such an approach is that it may cause a tremendous number of unnecessary backtracking steps due to heaps of incorrect variable instantiations. In this paper, we propose a new concept that refrains from backtracking by appeal to novel inference rules that allow for correcting previous variable bindings. We show that our approach is not only beneficial for classical proof systems but it is also well-suited for tasks in knowledge representation and reasoning. The major contribution of this paper lies actually in an application of our approach to a calculi conceived for reasoning with default logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Baumgartner, P. Frohlich, U. Furbach, and W. Nejdl. Semantically guided theorem proving for diagnosis application. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligene. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Besnard. An Introduction to Default Logic. Symbolic Computation-Artifical Intelligence. Springer Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Brüning. On Restricting the Generation of Clause Instances. In C. Bozşahin, U. Halici, K. Oflazer, and N. Yalabik, editors,3rd Turkish Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks, pages 277–286. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ceri, G. Gottlob, and L. Tanca. Logic Programming and Databases. Springer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Fermüller, A. Leitsch, T. Tammet, and N. Zamov. Resolution Methods for the Decision Problem, volume 679 of LNAI. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Letz, S. Bayerl, J. Schumann, and W. Bibel. SETHEO: A high-performance theorem prover. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 8(2):183–212, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Letz, K. Mayr, and Ch. Goller. Controlled integrations of the cut rule into connection tableau calculi. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 13(3):297–338, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Loveland. A simplified format for the model elimination theorem-proving procedure. Journal of the ACM, 16(3):349–363, 1969.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. K. M. Munch. A New Reduction Rule for the Connection Graph Proof Procedure. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 4:425–444, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Nicolas and T. Schaub. The XRay system: An implementation platform for local queryanswering in default logics. In A. Hunter and S. Parsons, editors, Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms in Information Systems, volume 1455 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 354–378. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Poole, R. Goebel, and R. Aleliunas. Theorist: A logical reasoning system for defaults and diagnosis. In N. Cercone and G. McCalla, editors, The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in the Representation of Knowledge, chapter 13, pages 331–352. Springer Verlag, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13(1-2):81–132, 1980.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Schaub and S. Brüning. Prolog technology for default reasoning: Proof theory and compilation techniques. Artificial Intelligence, 109(1):1–75, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brüning, S., Schaub, T. (1999). Avoiding Non-Ground Variables. In: Hunter, A., Parsons, S. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1638. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66131-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48747-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics