Skip to main content

Defeasible Goals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1638))

Abstract

In this paper we study defeasible goals in Gabbay’s labelled deductive systems. We prove the completeness of a simple and elegant proof theory for the labelled logic of defeasible goals by proving two phasing theorems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Bacchus and A.J. Grove. Utility independence in a qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of KR’96, pages 542–552, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Boutilier. Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the KR’94, pages 75–86, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Doyle, Y. Shoham, and M.P. Wellman. The logic of relative desires. In Sixth International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Charlotte, North Carolina, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Doyle and M.P. Wellman. Preferential semantics for goals. In Proceedings of the AAAI’91, pages 698–703, Anaheim, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Gabbay. Labelled Deductive Systems, volume 1. Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Huang and J. Bell. Dynamic goal hierarchies. In Intelligent Agent Systems: Theoretical and Practical Issues, LNAI 1027, pages 88–103. Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence, 44:167–207, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Lang. Conditional desires and utilities — an alternative approach to qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the ECAI’96, pages 318–322, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Makinson. On a fundamental problem of deontic logic. In P. McNamara and H. Prakken, editors, Norms, Logics and Information Systems. New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science. IOS Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Makinson and L. van der Torre. The logic of reusable propositional output. Submitted, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.D. Mullen. Does the logic of preference rest on a mistake? Metaphilosophy, 10:247–255, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Pearl. From conditional oughts to qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the UAI’93, pages 12–20, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.-W. Tan and J. Pearl. Qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the AAAI’94, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.-W. Tan and J. Pearl. Specification and evaluation of preferences under uncertainty. In Proceedings of the KR’94, pages 530–539, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. van der Torre. Labeled logics of conditional goals. In Proceedings of the ECAI’98, pages 368–369. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. van der Torre. Phased labeled logics of conditional goals. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 1489, pages 92–106. Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. van der Torre and Y. Tan. Cancelling and overshadowing: two types of defeasibility in defeasible deontic logic. In Proceedings of the IJCAI’95, pages 1525–1532. Morgan Kaufman, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Torre, L. (1999). Defeasible Goals. In: Hunter, A., Parsons, S. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1638. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66131-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48747-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics