Skip to main content

Handling Different Forms of Uncertainty in Regression Analysis: A Fuzzy Belief Structure Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1638))

Abstract

We propose a new approach to functional regression based on fuzzy evidence theory. This method uses a training set for computing a fuzzy belief structure which quantifies different types of uncertainties, such as nonspecificity, conflict, or low density of input data. The method can cope with a very large class of training data, such as numbers, intervals, fuzzy numbers, and, more generally, fuzzy belief structures. In order to limit calculations and improve output readability, we propose a belief structure simplification method, based on similarity between fuzzy sets and significance of these sets. The proposed model can provide predictions in several different forms, such as numerical, probabilistic, fuzzy or as a fuzzy belief structure. To validate the model, we propose two simulations and compare the results with classical or fuzzy regression methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Bauer. Approximations for decision making in the Dempster-Shafer theory. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 339–344, Saarbrücken, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Bersini, G. Bontempi, and M. Birattari. Is readibility compatible with accuracy? from neuro-fuzzy to lazy learning. In Fuzzy-Neuro Systems’ 98, pages 10–25, Munich, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. P. Dempster. Upper and lower probabilities induced by amultivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, AMS-38:325–339, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Den-ux. A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on Dempster-Shafer theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25(05):804–813, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Den-ux. Analysis of evidence-theoretic decision rules for pattern classification. Pattern Recognition, 30(7):1095–1107, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Den-ux. Function approximation in the framework of evidence theory: A connectionist approach. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Neural Networks, pages 199–203, Houston, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Diamond and H. Tanaka. Fuzzy regression analysis. In R. Slowinski, editor, Fuzzy sets in decision analysis, operations research and statistics, pages 349–387. Kluwer academic Publishers, Norwell, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.W. Guan and D.A. Bell. A generalization of the Dempster-Shafer theory. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 10–25, Chambéry, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Härdle. Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Hellendoorn and D. Driankov. Fuzzy model identification: selected approaches. Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.S.R Jang, C.T. Sun, and E. Mizutani. Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing. Prentice-Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. J. Klir and B. Yuan. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Sadddle River, N.J., 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Setnes, R. Babu-ska, U. Kaymak, and H. R. van Nauta Lemke. Similarity measures in fuzzy rule base simplification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-part B: Cybernetics, 28:376–386, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Shafer. A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Smets. The degree of belief in a fuzzy event. Information sciences, 28:45–62, 1982.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Smets and R. Kennes. The Transferable Belief Model. Artificial Intelligence, 66:191–243, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Takagi and M. Sugeno. Fuzzy identification of systems an its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15:116–132, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. H. Ward. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of American Statistical Association, 58:236–244, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. R. Yager, M. Fedrizzi, and J. Kacprzyk. Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. John Wiley and sons, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. R. Yager and D. P. Filev. Including probabilistic uncertainty in fuzzy logic controller modelling using Dempster-Shafer theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25:1221–1230, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Yen. Generalizing the Dempster-Shafer theory to fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 20:559–569, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Zwick, E. Carlstein, and D. V. Budescu. Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: a comparative analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1:221–242, 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Petit-Renaud, S., Denœux, T. (1999). Handling Different Forms of Uncertainty in Regression Analysis: A Fuzzy Belief Structure Approach. In: Hunter, A., Parsons, S. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1638. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66131-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48747-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics