Skip to main content

Diagnostic Rules of Increased Reliability for Critical Medical Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIMDM 1999)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to the construction of reliable diagnostic rules from the available cases with known diagnoses. It proposes a simple and general framework based on the generation of the so-called confirmation rules. A property of a system of confirmation rules is that it allows for indecisive answers, which, as a consequence, enables that all decisive answers proposed by the system are reliable. Moreover, the consensus of two or more confirmation rules additionally increases the reliability of diagnostic answers. Experimental results in the problem of coronary artery disease diagnosis illustrate the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Agrawal, H. Mannila, R. Srikant, H. Toivonen and A.I. Verkamo (1996) Fast discovery of association rules. In U.M. Fayyad, G. Piatetski-Shapiro, P. Smyth and R. Uthurusamy (Eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 307–328. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Gamberger (1995) A minimization approach to propositional inductive learning. In Proc. Eighth European Conference on Machine Learning, 151–160, Springer Lecture Notes in AI 912.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Gams (1989) New measurements highlight the importance of redundant knowledge. In Proc. European Working Session on Learning, 71–80. Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Grošelj, M. Kukar, J.J. Fetich and I. Kononenko (1997) Machine learning improves the accuracy of coronary artery disease diagnostic methods. Computers in Cardiology, 24:57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.S. Michalski, I. Mozetič, J. Hong, and N. Lavrač (1986) The multi-purpose incremental learning system AQ15 and its testing application on three medical domains. In Proc. Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1041–1045, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.R. Quinlan (1996) Boosting, bagging, and C4.5. In Proc. Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 725–730, AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.L. Rivest and R. Sloan (1988) Learning complicated concepts reliably and use-fully. In Proc. Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, 69–79, Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gamberger, D., Lavrač, N., Grošelj, C. (1999). Diagnostic Rules of Increased Reliability for Critical Medical Applications. In: Horn, W., Shahar, Y., Lindberg, G., Andreassen, S., Wyatt, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIMDM 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1620. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48720-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48720-4_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66162-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48720-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics