Skip to main content

Extending the Conceptual Graph Approach to Represent Evaluative Attitudes in Discourse

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Standards and Practices (ICCS 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1640))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we present a three-tiered framework extending the conceptual graph theory in order to represent evaluative attitudes expressed by locutors in a discourse. The descriptive plan models the locutors’ (including the narrator’s) speech acts and mental attitudes. The evaluative plan contains locutors’ evaluative attitudes which provide an account of several linguistic modalities in discourse. The argumentative plan gathers locutors’ discursive goals and models the discourse’s argumentative structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen J. F. (1983) Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol 26 n1l.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braüner T. (1998) Peircean graphs for the modal logic S5, In M. L. Mugnier, M. Chein (edts.), Conceptual Structures: Theory, Tools and Applications, Springer Verlag, LNAI n. 1453, 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ducrot O. (1991) Dire ou ne pas Dire, Principes de sémantique linguistique, Herman, Collection Savoir, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eemeren F. van, Grootendorst R., Kruiger T. (1987) Hanbook of Argumentation Theory, Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grosz B.J., Sidner. C.L. (1986), Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse, Computational Linguistics, n. 2(3), July September, 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kamp H., Reyle U. (1993) From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le Querler N. (1996), Typologies des modalités, Presses Universitaires de Caen, Fr.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mineau G., Moulin B., Sowa J.F. (edts.), Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge representation, Springer Verlag, LNAI n.69

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moulin B. (1992) A conceptual graph approach for representing temporal information in discourse, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol5 n3, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin B. (1993) The representation of linguistic information in an approach used for modelling temporal knowledge in discourses. In Moulin B., Sowa J.F. (edts.), Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge representation, Springer Verlag, LNAI n.69 [8], 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moulin B., Dumas S. (1994) The temporal structure of a discourse and verb tense determination, In W. M. Tepfenhart, J. P. Dick, J. F. Sowa, (edts.) (1994), Conceptual Structures: Current Practices, LNAI n. 835, Springer Verlag, 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moulin B. (1997) Temporal contexts for discourse representation: an extension of the conceptual graph approach, the Journal of Applied Intelligence, vol 7 n3, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moulin B., Rousseau D., Lapalme G. (1994), A Multi-Agent Approach for Modelling Conversations, Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language, Paris, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Øhrstrøm P. (1996) Existential graphs and tense logic, In P. W. Eklund, G. Ellis, G. Mann (edts.), Conceptual Structures: Knowledge representation as Interlingua Springer Verlag, LNAI n. 1115, 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plantin C. (1990) Essais sur l’ argumentation, Paris: Editions Kimé.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts D.D. (1973) The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce, The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sowa, J. F. (1984) Conceptual Structures, Reading Mass: Addison Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Van den Berg H. (1993) Modal logics for conceptual graphs, In Moulin B., Sowa J.F. (edts.), Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge representation, Springer Verlag, LNAI n.69 [8], 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moulin, B., Irandoust, H. (1999). Extending the Conceptual Graph Approach to Represent Evaluative Attitudes in Discourse. In: Tepfenhart, W.M., Cyre, W. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Standards and Practices. ICCS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1640. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48659-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48659-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66223-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48659-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics