Skip to main content

Active Exploration in Instance-Based Preference Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1650))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Knowledge of the preferences of individual users is essential for intelligent systems whose performance is tailored for individual users, such as agents that interact with human users, instructional environments, and learning apprentice systems. Various memory-based, instance-based, and case-based systems have been developed for preference modeling, but these system have generally not addressed the task of selecting examples to use as queries to the user. This paper describes UGAMA, an approach to learning preference criteria through active exploration. Under this approach, Unit Gradient Approximations (UGAs) of the underlying quality function are obtained at a set of reference points through a series of queries to the user. Equivalence sets of UGAs are then merged and aligned (MA) with the apparent boundaries between linear regions. In an empirical evaluation with artificial data, use of UGAs as training data for an instance-based ranking algorithm (1ARC) led to more accurate ranking than training with random instances, and use of UGAMA led to greater ranking accuracy than UGAs alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Aha. Generalizing from case studies: A case study. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 1–10, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Broos and K. Branting. Compositional instance-based learning. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Seattle, Washington, July 31-August 4, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Branting and P. Broos. Automated acquisition of user preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46:55–77, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Branting. Learning user preferences by exploration. In The Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 27-30 June 1999. 1999. Under review.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Callan, T. Fawcett, and E. Rissland. Adaptive case-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the Third DARPA Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pages 179–190. Morgan Kaufmann, May 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Dent, J. Boticario, J. McDermott, T. Mitchell, and D. Zabowski. A personal learning apprentice. In Proceedings of Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 96–103, San Jose, CA, July 12-16 1992. AAAI Press/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12):61–70, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ralf Herbirch, Thore Graepel, Peter Bollmann-Sdorra, and Klaus Obermayer. Learning preference relations for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization. AAAI Press, July 26-27 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, second edition, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Maes. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7):31–40, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Maes and R. Kozierok. Learning interface agents. In Proceedings of Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 459–466, Washington, D.C., July 11-15 1993. AAAI Press/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Utgoff and J. Clouse. Two kinds of training information for evaluation function learning. In Proceedings of Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 596–600, Anaheim, July 14-19 1991. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Utgoff and S. Saxena. Learning a preference predicate. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 115–121, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karl Branting, L. (1999). Active Exploration in Instance-Based Preference Modeling. In: Althoff, KD., Bergmann, R., Branting, L. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1650. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48508-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48508-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66237-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48508-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics