Skip to main content

A Case Retention Policy based on Detrimental Retrieval

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1650))

Abstract

This paper presents a policy to retain new cases based on retrieval benefits for case-based planning (CBP). After each case-based problem solving episode, an analysis of the adaptation effort is made to evaluate the guidance provided by the retrieved cases. If the guidance is determined to be detrimental, the obtained solution is retain as a new case in the case base. Otherwise, if the retrieval is beneficial, the case base remains unchanged. We will observe that the notion of adaptable cases is not adequate to address the competence of a case base in the context of CBP. Instead, we claim that the notion of detrimental retrieval is more adequate. We compare our retain policy against two policies in the CBP literature and claim that our policy to retain cases based on the benefits is more effective. Our claim is supported by empirical validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aamodt, A. & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundation issues, methodological variations and system approaches. AI-Communications, 7(1):pp 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, R., Muñoz-Avila, H., Veloso, M., Melis, E. (1998). Case-based reasoning applied to planning tasks. In M. Lenz, B. Bartsch-Spoerl, H.-D. Burkhard, & S. Wess (Eds.) Case-Based Reasoning Technology: From Foundations to Applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihrig, L. & Kambhampati, S. (1996). Design and implementation of a replay framework based on a partial order planner. In Weld, D., editor, Proceedings of AAAI-96. IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihrig, L., & Kambhampati, S. (1994). Derivational replay for partial-order planning. Proceedings of AAAI-94, AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, H. & Shimazu, H. (1996). The experience-sharing architecture: a case study on corporate-wide case-based software quality control. In Case-Basedsnow Reasoning: Experience, Lessons, & Future Directions, Leake, D.B.(Editor). MA: AAAI Press / MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leake, D.B., & Wilson, D.C. (1998). Categorizing case-base maintenance: dimensions and directions. preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lenz, B., Bartsch-Spoerl, H.-D. Burkhard, & S. Wess (Eds.). (1998). Case-Based Reasoning Technology: From Foundations to Applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovitch, S., & Scott, P.D. (1993). Information Filtering: selection Mechanisms in learning systems. Machine Learning, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllester, D. & Rosenblitt, D. (1991). Systematic nonlinear planning. Proceedings of AAAI-91, AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Avila, H. (1998). Integrating Twofold Case Retrieval and Complete Decision Replay in CAPlan/CbC. PhD Thesis. University of Kaiserslautern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Avila, H. & Hüllen, J. (1995). Feature weighting by explaining casebased planning episodes. In Third European Workshop (EWCBR-96), number 1168 in LNAI. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Avila, H. & Weberskirch, F. (1996a). A specification of the domain of process planning: Properties, problems and solutions. Technical Report LSA-96-10E, Center for Learning Systems and Applications, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Avila, H. & Weberskirch, F. (1996b). Planning for manufacturing workpieces by storing, indexing and replaying planning decisions. In Proc. of the 3nd International Conference on AI Planning Systems (AIPS-96). AAAIPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsti, R., & Qiang, Y., (1997). Maintaining Unstructured Case Bases, in Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, In Leake D.,B., and Plaza E., (Eds). Proceedings of the International Conference on Case Based Reasoning, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, B., & Keane, M.T., (1995). Remembering to forget: A competencepreserving case deletion policy for case-based reasoning systems. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, B., & Keane, M.T., (1998). Adaptation-guided retrieval: Questioning the similarity assumption in Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso, M. (1994). Planning and learning by analogical reasoning. Number 886 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso, M. & Carbonell, J. (1993). Derivational analogy in prodigy: Automating case acquisition, storage, and utilization. Machine Learning, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, I., (1997). Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for Enterprise Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberskirch, F. (1995). Combining SNLP-like planning and dependency-maintenance. Technical Report LSA-95-10E, Centre for Learning Systems and Applications, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muñoz-Avila, H. (1999). A Case Retention Policy based on Detrimental Retrieval. In: Althoff, KD., Bergmann, R., Branting, L. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1650. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48508-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48508-2_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66237-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48508-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics