Skip to main content

When Experience is Wrong: Examining CBR for Changing Tasks and Environments⋆

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1650))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Case-based problem-solving systems reason and learn from experiences, building up case libraries of problems and solutions to guide future reasoning. The expected benefits of this learning process depend on two types of regularity: (1) problem-solution regularity, the relationship between problem-to-problem and solution-to-solution similarity measures that assures that solutions to similar prior problems are a useful starting point for solving similar current problems, and (2) problem-distribution regularity, the relationship between old and new problems that assures that the case library will contain cases similar to the new problems it encounters. Unfortunately, these types of regularity are not assured. Even in contexts for which initial regularity is sufficient, problems may arise if a system’s users, tasks, or external environment change over time. This paper defines criteria for assessing the two types of regularity, discusses how the definitions may be used to assess the need for case-base maintenance, and suggests maintenance approaches for responding to those needs. In particular, it discusses the role of analysis of performance over time in responding to environmental changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Cheetham and J. Graf. Case-based reasoning in color matching. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 1–12, Berlin, 1997. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boi Faltings. Probabilistic indexing for case-based prediction. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 611–622, Berlin, 1997. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Fox and D. Leake. Using introspective reasoning to refine indexing. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 391–397, San Francisco, CA, August 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Fox. Introspective Reasoning for Case-based Planning. PhD thesis, Indiana University, 1995. Computer Science Department.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Harries, K. Horn, and C. Sammut. Learning in time ordered domains with hidden changes in context. In Papers from the AAAI 1998 Workshop on Predicting the Future: AI Approaches to Time-Series Problems, pages 29–33. AAAI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Kriegsman and R. Barletta. Building a case-based help desk application. IEEE Expert, 8(6):18–26, December 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Lane and C. Brodley. Approaches to online learning and concept drift for user identification in computer security. In Papers from the AAAI 1998 Workshop on Predicting the Future: AI Approaches to Time-Series Problems, pages 64–70. AAAI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Leake and D. Wilson. Case-base maintenance: Dimensions and directions. In P. Cunningham, B. Smyth, and M. Keane, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 196–207, Berlin, 1998. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Redmond. Learning by Observing and Understanding Expert Problem Solving. PhD thesis, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1992. Technical report GIT-CC-92/43.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Salganicoff. Tolerating concept and sampling shift in lazy learning using prediction error context switching. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(1-5):133–155, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Smyth and M. Keane. Remembering to forget: A competence-preserving case deletion policy for case-based reasoning systems. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 377–382, Montreal, August 1995. IJCAI.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Smyth and M. Keane. FrDesign à la Déjà Vu: Reducing the adaptation overhead. In D. Leake, editor, Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Smyth and E. McKenna. Modelling the competence of case-bases. In P. Cunningham, B. Smyth, and M. Keane, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 208–220, Berlin, 1998. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Houman Talebzadeh, Sanda Mandutianu, and Christian Winner. Countrywide loan-underwriting expert system. AI Magazine, 16(1):51–64, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Veloso. Planning and Learning by Analogical Reasoning. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ian Watson. Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for Enterprise Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Zhu and Q. Yang. Remembering to add: Competence-preserving case-addition policies for case based reasoning. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leake, D.B., Wilson, D.C. (1999). When Experience is Wrong: Examining CBR for Changing Tasks and Environments⋆. In: Althoff, KD., Bergmann, R., Branting, L. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1650. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48508-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48508-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66237-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48508-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics