Registration and Composition of Stacks of Serial Optical Slices Captured by a Confocal Microscope

  • Martin Ĉapek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1689)


This article deals with image and volume registration of stacks of serial optical slices from a large biological tissue specimen captured by a confocal microscope. Due to the limited depth of observation and the restricted field of view of the confocal microscope the oversized specimen has to be sliced into smaller physical sections and scanned individually. The composition of the stacks of optical slices, which is based on data registration, is achieved in two steps. First, sub-volumes are created by volume registration of overlapping stacks of optical slices (volumes) captured from individual physical section. Second, image registration of peripheral images of sub-volumes of neighboring physical slices makes possible to compose 3D image of the whole specimen. Both registrations are based on similarity measures, such as the sum of absolute valued differences, normalized correlation coefficient, and mutual information. Data registration requires optimization of the search for the global extreme of a similarity measure over a parametrical space. Therefore, optimization strategies—n-step search, adaptive simulated annealing and stochastic approach—are used, and their optimal set-up is presented. The composition of stacks enables us to visualize and study a large biological specimen in 3D in high resolution.


Mutual Information Image Registration Normalize Correlation Coefficient Data Registration Stochastic Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    apek, M., Krekule, I., Kubínová, L.: Practical Experiments with Automatic Image Registration of Serial Optical Slices of Thick Tissue. Conf. Proc., 8-th Intern. IMEKO Conf. on Measurement in Clinical Medicine, Dubrovnik, Croatia, p. 10–6–10–9, September 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    apek, M., Krekule, I.: Alignment of Adjacent Picture Frames Captured by a CLSM. IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 1999. In press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, L. G.: A Survey of Image Registration Techniques. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 24,No. 4, p. 325–376, December 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.: Multimodality Image Registration by Maximization of Mutual Information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 16,No. 2, p. 187–198, April 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    apek, M.: Optimisation Strategies Applied to Global Similarity Based Image Registration Methods. Conf. Proc., 7-th Intern. Conf. in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Interactive Digital Media'99, Plze, Czech Republic, February 1999. In press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker, J. R.: Algorithms for Image Processing and Computer Vision. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Press, W. H., et al.: Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ingber, L.: Simulated Annealing: Practice versus Theory. Mathl. Comput. Modelling, Vol. 18,No. 11, p. 29–57, 1993.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dani, P., Chaudhuri, S.: Automated Assembling of Images: Image Montage Preparation. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 28,No. 3, p. 431–445, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tekalp, A., M.: Digital Video Processing. Prentice Hall, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Ĉapek
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyAcademy of Sciences of CRPraha 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations