Skip to main content

Importing MDG Verification Results into HOL

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1690))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Formal hardware verification systems can be split into two categories: theorem proving systems and automatic finite state machine based systems. Each approach has its own complementary advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we consider the combination of two such systems: HOL (a theorem proving system) and MDG (an automatic system). As HOL hardware verification proofs are based on the hierarchical structure of the design, submodules can be verified using other systems such as MDG. However, the results of MDG are not in the appropriate form for this. We have proved a set of theorems that express how results proved using MDG can be converted into the form used in traditional HOL hardware verification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. E. Bryant. Symbolic boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams. ACM Computer Surveys, 24(3), September 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Corella, Z. Zhou, X. Song, M. Langevin, and E. Cerny. Multiway decision-graphs for automated hardware verification. Formal Methods in System Design, 10(1):7–46, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Curzon. The formal verification of the Fairisle ATM switching element. Technical Report 329, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Curzon. Tracking design changes with formal machine-checked proof. The Computer Journal, 38(2), July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Curzon, S. Tahar, and O. Aït-Mohamed. The verification of aspects of a decision diagram based verification system. In Jim Grundy and Malcolm Newey, editors, Theorem Proving in Higher-Order Logics: Emerging Trends, pages 31–46. Department of Computer Science, The Australian National University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. C. Gordon. Why higher-order logic is a good formalism for specifying and verifying hardware. In G. J. Milne and P. A. Subrahmanyam, editors, Formal Aspects of VLSI Design: the 1985 Edinburgh Workshop on VLSI, pages 153–177. North-Holland, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. J. C. Gordon. Combining deductive theorem proving with symbolic state enumeration. Presented at 21 Years of Hardware Verification, Royal Society Workshop to mark 21 years of BCS FACS, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/mjcg/BDD, December 1998.

  8. M. J. C. Gordon and T.F. Melham. Introduction to HOL: A Theorem Proving Environment for Higher-order Logic. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Havelund and N. Shankar. Experiments in theorem proving and model checking for protocol verification. In Formal methods Europe FME’ 96, number 1051 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 662–682, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Joyce and C. Seger. Linking BDD-based symbolic evaluation to interactive theorem-proving. In the 30th Design Automation Conference, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Rajan, N. Shankar, and M.K. Srivas. An integration of model-checking with automated proof checking. In Pierre Wolper, editor, Computer-Aided Verification, number 939 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 84–97. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Tahar and P. Curzon. Comparing HOL and MDG: A case study on the verification of an ATM switch fabric. To appear in the Nordic Journal of Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Tahar, X. Song, E. Cerny, Z. Zhou, M. Langevin, and O. Aït-Mohamed. Modeling and automatic formal verification of the Fairisle ATM switch fabric using MDGs. To appear in IEEE Transactions on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Xiong and P. Curzon. The verification of a translator for MDG’s components in HOL. In MUCORT98, Third Middlesex University Conference on Research in Technology, pages 55–59, April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Zhou and N. Boulerice. MDG Tools (V1.0) User Manual. University of Montreal, Dept. D’IRO, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Zhu, J. Joyce, and C. Seger. Verification of the Tamarack-3 microprocessor in a hybrid verification environment. In Higher-Order Logic theorem proving and Its Applications, The 6th International Workshop, number 780 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 252–266. B. C., Canada, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiong, H., Curzon, P., Tahar, S. (1999). Importing MDG Verification Results into HOL. In: Bertot, Y., Dowek, G., Théry, L., Hirschowitz, A., Paulin, C. (eds) Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics. TPHOLs 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1690. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48256-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48256-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66463-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48256-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics