Skip to main content

Interface of Inference Models with Concept and Medical Record Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2101))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Medical information systems and standards are increasingly based on principled models of at least three distinct sorts of information — patient data, concepts (terminology), and guidelines (decision support). Well defined interfaces are required between the three types of model to allow development to proceed independently. Two of the major issues to be dealt with in the defining of such interfaces are the interaction between ontological and inferential abstractions — how general notions such as ‘abnormal cardiovascular finding’ are abstracted from concrete data- and the management of the meaning of information in guidelines in different contexts. This paper explores these two issues and their ramifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rector, A.L. The Interface between Information, Terminology, and Inference Models. in Medinfo-2001 (2001) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tu, S.W. and M.A. Musen. Modeling data and knowledge in the EON guideline architecture. in Medinfo 2001 (2001) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  3. HL7, HL7 Data Model Development, (2000), http://www.hl7.org/library/data-model/

  4. CEN/WG1, ENV13606: Electronic Healthcare Record Architecture,. 1999, CEN.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingram, D., GEHR: The Good European Health Record, in Health in the New Communications Age, M. Laires, M. Ladeira, and J. Christensen, Editors. IOS Press: Amsterdam. (1995) 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Education, C.f.H.I.a.M., The GEHR Homepage, (1997), http://www.cww.chime.ucl.ac.uk/HealthI/GEHR/

  7. Spackman, K.A., K.E. Campbell, and R.A. Côté, SNOMED-RT: A reference Terminology for Health Care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), ((Symposium special issue)): (1997) 640–644.

    Google Scholar 

  8. OpenGALEN, OpenGALEN Home Page, http://www.opengalen.org

  9. Rector, A., Thesauri and formal classifications: Terminologies for people and machines. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37(4-5): (1998) 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pryor, T. and G. Hripscsak, The Arden syntax for medical logic modules. Int J Clin Monit Comput,. 10(4): (1993) 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu, S.W. and M.A. Musen. A flexible approach to guideline modelling. in AMIA Fall Symposium. Hanley and Belfus (1999) 420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, P.D., et al., Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care. JAMIA, (Symposium Special Issue): (2000) 389–393.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fox, J. and S. Das, Safe and Sound., Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peleg, M., et al. GLIF3: The evolution of a guideline representation format. in AMIA Fall Symposium (2000) 645–649.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shahr, Y. Timing is everything: temporal reasoning and temporal data maintenance in medicine. in Seventh Joint European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Medical Decision Making. Springer Verlag (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berg, M., Medical work and the computer-based patient record: A sociological perspective. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37: (1998) 294–301.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bray, J., et al., Identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional study of paper and computerised medical records. British Medical Journal, 321: (2000) 548–050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hripscak, G., et al. The Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Modules. in Fourteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC-90). McGraw Hill (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. HL7, HL7 Home Page, http://www.hl7.org

  20. Solomon, W., et al., Having our cake and eating it too: How the GALEN Intermediate Representation reconciles internal complexity with users’ requirements for appropriateness and simplicity. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, (Fall Symposium Special Issue): (2000) 819–823.

    Google Scholar 

  21. College of American Pathologists, SNOMED Home Page, http://www.snomed.org

  22. Nowlan, W.A., Clinical workstation: Identifying clinical requirements and understanding clinical information. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing,. 34: (1994) 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Franconi, E. A Semantic approach for schema evolution and versioning in object-oriented databases. in 6th International Conference on Rules and Objects in Databases (DOOD’2000) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. The OIL Home Page, (2000), http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rector, A.L., Johnson, P.D., Tu, S., Wroe, C., Rogers, J. (2001). Interface of Inference Models with Concept and Medical Record Models. In: Quaglini, S., Barahona, P., Andreassen, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2101. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42294-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48229-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics