Advertisement

Expert Knowledge and Its Role in Learning Bayesian Networks in Medicine: An Appraisal

  • Peter Lucas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2101)

Abstract

A major part of the medical knowledge concerns diseases that are uncommon or even rare. The uncommon nature of these disorders renders it impossible to collect data of a sufficiently large number of patients to develop machine-learning models that faithfully reflect the subtleties of the domain. An alternative is to develop a Bayesian network with the help of clinical experts. Lack of data is then compensated for by eliciting the structure with its associated local probability distributions from the experts. The resulting network can be subsequently evaluated using the available dataset. One may also consider adopting very strong independence assumptions, such as in naive Bayesian models. Normally not all subtleties of the interactions among the variables in the domain are reflected in such models. Yet, a relatively small dataset suffices to obtain an acceptably accurate model. This paper explores the trade-offs between modelling using expert knowledge, and machine learning using a small clinical dataset in the context of Bayesian networks.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Bayesian Model Expert Knowledge Independent Form Structure Bayesian Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Berthold and D.J. Hand (Eds.). Intelligent Data Analysis: an Introduction. Springer, Berlin, 1999.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.G. Cowell, A.P. Dawid, D. Spiegelhalter. Sequential model criticism in probabilistic expert systems. PAMI 15(3) (1993) 209–219.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Domingos and M. Pazzani. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning 29 (1997) 103–130.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.I.R. Friedman, D. Geiger and M. Goldszmidt. Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29 (1997) 131–163.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.J.F. Lucas and L.C. van der Gaag. Principles of Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, 1991.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.J.F. Lucas, H. Boot, B.G. Taal. Computer-based decision-support in the management of primary gastric non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Meth Inf Med 37 (1998) 206–219.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Ramoni and P. Sebastiani. Efficient Parameter Learning in Bayesian Networks from Incomplete Data. Report KMi-TR-41, KMI, Open University, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Ramoni and P. Sebastiani. Bayesian Knowledge Discoverer: reference manual. KMI, Open University, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Lucas
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computing ScienceUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations