Abstract
In more than a decade of clinical use of electrical stimulation to accelerate the chronic wound healing each patient and wound were registered and a wound healing process was weekly followed. The controlled study involved a conventional conservative treatment, sham treatment, biphasic pulsed current, and direct current electrical stimulation. A quantity of available data suffices for an analysis with machine learning methods.
So far only a limited number of studies have investigated the wound and patient attributes which affect the chronic wound healing. There is none to our knowledge to include the treatment attributes. The aims of our study are to determine effects of the wound, patient and treatment attributes on the wound healing process and to propose a system for prediction of the wound healing rate.
In the first step of our analysis we determined which wound and patient attributes play a predominant role in the wound healing process. Then we investigated a possibility to predict the wound healing rate at the beginning of the treatment based on the initial wound, patient and treatment attributes. Finally we discussed the possibility to enhance the wound healing rate prediction accuracy by predicting it after a few weeks of the wound healing follow-up.
By using the attribute estimation algorithms ReliefF and RReliefF we obtained a ranking of the prognostic factors which was comprehensi- ble to field experts. We also used regression and classification trees to build models for prediction of the wound healing rate. The obtained results are encouraging and may form a basis of an expert system for the chronic wound healing rate prediction. If the wound healing rate is known, then the provided information can help to formulate the appro- priate treatment decisions and orient resources to those individuals with poor prognosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J.A. Birke, A. Novick, C. A. Patout, and W. C. Coleman. Healing rates of plantar ulcers in leprosy and diabetes. Leprosy Rev., 63:365–374, 1992.
L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Inc., Belmont, California, 1984.
D. Cukjati, R. Karba, S. Reberšek, and D. Miklavčič. Modeling of chronic wound healing dynamics. Med.Biol.Eng.Comput., 38:339–347, 2000.
D. Cukjati, S. Reberšek, and D. Miklavčič. A reliable method of determining wound healing rate. Med.Biol.Eng.Comput., 2001a. (in press).
D. Cukjati, M. Robnik-Šikonja, S. Reberšek, I. Kononenko, and D. Miklavčič. Prognostic factors, prediction of chronic wound healing and electrical stimulation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2001b. (submitted).
T.G. Dietterich. Machine learning research: Four current directions. AI Magazine, 18(4):97–136, 1997.
J.A. Feedar and L. C. Kloth. Conservative management of chronic wounds. In L. C. Kloth and J.M. McCulloch, editors, Wound Healing: Alternatives in Management, pages 135–172. F. A. Davis Co., Philadelphia, 1990.
A. Jerčinovič, R. Karba, L. Vodovnik, A. Stefanovska, P. Krošelj, R. Turk, I. Džidič, H. Benko, and R. Šavrin. Low frequency pulsed current and pressure ulcer healing. IEEE Trans.Rehab.Eng., 2(4):225–233, 1994.
M. Johnson. Using cluster analysis to develop a healing typology in vascular ulcers. J.Vasc.Nurs., 15:45–49, 1997.
R. Karba, D. Šemrov, L. Vodovnik, H. Benko, and R. Šavrin. DC electrical stimulation for chronic wound healing enhancement. Part 1. Clinical study and determination of electrical field distribution in the numerical wound model. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 43:265–270, 1997.
I. Kononenko, E. Šimec, and M. Robnik-Šikonja. Overcoming the myopia of inductive learning algorithms with RELIEFF. Applied Intelligence, 7:39–55, 1997.
I.R. Lyman, J. H. Tenery, and R. P. Basson. Corelation between decrease in bacterial load and rate of wound healing. Surg.Gynecol.Obstet., 130(4):616–620, 1970.
J.R. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
M. Robnik Šikonja. CORE — a system that predicts continuous variables. In Proceedings of Electrotehnical and Computer Science Conference, pages B145–148, 1997.
M. Robnik Šikonja and I. Kononenko. An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. In Douglas H. Fisher, editor, Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (ICML’97), pages 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
Marko Robnik-Šikonja and Igor Kononenko. Comprehensible interpretation of Relief’s estimates. 2001. (submitted).
D.J. Shea. Pressure sores classification and management. Clin.Orthop.Rel.Res., 112: 89–100, 1975.
A.I. Skene, J. M. Smith, C. J. Doré, A. Charlett, and J. D. Lewis. Venous leg ulcers: a prognostic index to predict time to healing. BMJ, 305:1119–1121, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Robnik-Šikonja, M., Cukjati, D., Kononenko, I. (2001). Evaluation of Prognostic Factors and Prediction of Chronic Wound Healing Rate by Machine Learning Tools. In: Quaglini, S., Barahona, P., Andreassen, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2101. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42294-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48229-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive