Skip to main content

Lower Bounds in the Quantum Cell Probe Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2076))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce a new model for studying quantum data structure problems — the quantum cell probe model. We prove a lower bound for the static predecessor problem in the address-only version of this model where, essentially, we allow quantum parallelism only over the ‘address lines’ of the queries. This model subsumes the classical cell probe model, and many quantum query algorithms like Grover’s algorithm fall into this framework. We prove our lower bound by obtaining a round elimination lemma for quantum communication complexity. A similar lemma was proved by Miltersen, Nisan, Safra and Wigderson [9] for classical communication complexity, but their proof does not generalise to the quantum setting.

We also study the static membership problem in the quantum cell probe model. Generalising a result of Yao [16], we show that if the storage scheme is implicit, that is it can only store members of the subset and ‘pointers’, then any quantum query scheme must make Ω(log n) probes. We also consider the one-round quantum communication complexity of set membership and show tight bounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Beame and F. Fich. Optimal bounds for the predecessor problem. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 295–304, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Buhrman, P. Miltersen, J. Radhakrishnan, and S. Venkatesh. Are bitvectors Optimal? In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 449–458, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Cleve, W. van Dam,, M. Nielsen, and A. Tapp. Quantum entanglement and the communication complexity of the inner product function. In Proceedings of the 1st NASA International Conference on Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1509, pages 61–74, 1998. Also quant-ph/9708019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Fredman, J. Komlós, and E. Szemerédi. Storing a sparse table with O(1) worst case access time. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 31(3):538–544, 1984.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 212–219, 1996. Also quant-ph/9605043.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Høyer and J. Neerbek. Bounds on quantum ordered searching. Manuscript at quant-ph/0009032, September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Klauck. On rounds in quantum communication. Manuscript at quant-ph/0004100, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. B. Miltersen. Cell probe complexity — a survey. Invited talk at the pre-conference workshop on Advances in data structures preceding the 19th conference on the Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, December 11-12, 1999, Chennai, India. Also available from http://www.daimi.au.dk/~bromille/Papers/survey3.ps.

  9. P. B. Miltersen, N. Nisan, S. Safra, and A. Wigderson. On data structures and asymmetric communication complexity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 57:37–49, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Nayak, A. Ta-Shma, and D. Zuckerman. Interaction in quantum communication complexity. Manuscript at quant-ph/0005106, May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Newman. Private vs common random bits in communication complexity. Information Processing Letters, 39:67–71, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Radhakrishnan, P. Sen, and S. Venkatesh. The quantum complexity of set membership. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 554–562, 2000. Also quant-ph/0007021.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Sen and S. Venkatesh. Lower bounds in the quantum cell probe model. Full version. Manuscript at quant-ph/0104100.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. C-C. Yao. Probabilistic computations: towards a unified measure of complexity. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 209–213, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. C-C. Yao. Should tables be sorted? Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 28(3):615–628, 1981.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. C-C. Yao. Quantum circuit complexity. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 352–361, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sen, P., Venkatesh, S. (2001). Lower Bounds in the Quantum Cell Probe Model. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2076. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42287-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48224-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics