Skip to main content

Data Complexity Analysis for Classifier Combination

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2096))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multiple classifier methods are effective solutions to difficult pattern recognition problems. However, empirical successes and failures have not been completely explained. Amid the excitement and confusion, uncertainty persists in the optimality of method choices for specific problems due to strong data dependences of classifier performance. In response to this, I propose that further exploration of the methodology be guided by detailed descriptions of geometrical characteristics of data and classifier models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Devroye, Any discrimination rule can have an arbitrarily bad probability of error for finite sample size, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4,2, March 1982, 154–157.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Devroye, Automatic pattern recognition: a study of the probability of error, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10,4, July 1988, 530–599.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. R.P.W. Duin, Compactness and Complexity of Pattern Recognition Problems, in C. Perneel, eds., Proc. Int. Symposium on Pattern Recognition, In Memoriam Pierre Devijver, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Feb 12, 1999, 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.P.W. Duin, Classifiers in almost empty spaces, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, September 3–8, 2000, II, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Engvall, A least upper bound for the average classification accuracy of multiple observers, Pattern Recognition, 12, 415–419.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.C. Fishburn, The Theory of Social Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Fukunaga, D.L. Kessell, Estimation of classification error, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 20,12, December 1971, 1521–1527.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Geman, E. Bienenstock, R. Doursat, Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma, Neural Computation, 4, 1992, 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Gernert, Distance or similarity measures which respect the internal structure of objects, Methods of Operations Research, 43, 1981, 329–335.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Giacinto, F. Roli, A theoretical framework for dynamic classifier selection, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, September 3–8, 2000, II, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.J. Hand, Recent advances in error rate estimation, Pattern Recognition Letters, 4, October 1986, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T.K. Ho, M. Basu, Measuring the Complexity of Classification Problems, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, September 3–8, 2000, II, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.K. Ho, Complexity of classification problems and comparative advantages of combined classifiers, in J. Kittler, F. Roli, eds., Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1857, Springer, 2000, 97–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Hoekstra, R.P.W. Duin, On the nonlinearity of pattern classifiers, Proc. of the 13th ICPR, Vienna, August 1996, D271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.K. Jain, R.P.W. Duin, J. Mao, Statistical pattern recognition: A review, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-22,1, January 2000, 4–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Kittler, P.A. Devijver, Statistical properties of error estimators in performance assessment of recognition systems, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4,2, March 1982, 215–220.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R.P.W. Duin, J. Matas, On combining classifiers, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-20,3, March 1998, 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E.M. Kleinberg, An overtraining-resistant stochastic modeling method for pattern recognition, Annals of Statistics, 4,6, December 1996, 2319–2349.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. L.I. Kuncheva, C.J. Whitaker, C.A. Shipp, R.P.W. Duin, Is independence good for combining classifiers? Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, September 3–8, 2000, II, 168–171.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. LeBlanc, R. Tibshirani, Combining estimates in regression and classi_cation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91,436, December 1996, 1641–1650.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. V.D. Mazurov, A.I. Krivonogov, V.L. Kazantsev, Solving of Optimization and Identification Problems by the Committee Methods, Pattern Recognition, 20,4, 1987, 371–378.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Raudys, V. Pikelis, On dimensionality, sample size, classification error, and complexity of classification algorithm in pattern recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2,3, May 1980, 242–252.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Raudys, A.K. Jain, Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: Recommendations for practitioners, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13,3, 1991, 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.Y. Sohn, Meta analysis of classification algorithms for pattern recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21,11, 1999, 1137–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G.T. Toussaint, Bibliography on estimation of misclassification, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 20,4, July 1974, 472–479.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Tumer, J. Ghosh, Analysis of decision boundaries in linearly combined neural classifiers, Pattern Recognition, 29, 1996, 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. V. Vapnik, Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data, Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kam Ho, T. (2001). Data Complexity Analysis for Classifier Combination. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2096. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48219-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48219-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42284-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48219-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics