Skip to main content

Combining Supervised Remote Sensing Image Classifiers Based on Individual Class Performances

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2096))

Abstract

This article focuses on the use of multiple classifier systems (MCSs) based on dynamic classifier selection. Four implementation strategies of MCSs are compared: majority voting, belief networks, and two designs based on dynamic classifier selection. Experimental results indicate that the direction taken by Woods et al. [1] is the best alternative for remote sensing applications for which the classifier-dependent posterior distributions are unknown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Woods K., Kevin Bowyer, W.P. Kegelmeyer, “Combination of Multiple Classifiers Using Local Accuracy Estimates”, IEEE Trans. PAMI, vol. 19,no. 4, April 1997, pp. 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. A. Schowengerdt, Remote Sensing–Models and methods for image processing, Academic Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smits P.C., S.G. Dellepiane, and R. Schowengerdt, 1999. “Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and a proposal for a cost-based approach,” Int. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(8), pp. 1461–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Benediktsson and I. Kanellopoulos, 1999. “Classification of multisource and hyperspectral data based on decision fusion”. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 37,No. 3, May 1999, pp. 1367–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kittler, J., A. Hojjatoleslami, T. Windeatt, 1997. “Strategies for combining classifiers employing shared and distinct pattern representations,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 18, pp. 1373–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giacinto G., F. Roli and L. Bruzzone, 2000. “Combination of neural and statistical algorithms for supervised classification of remote-sensing images,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 21(5) pp. 385–397. Electronic Annex on-line. http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/patrec.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, Y.S., and Suen, C.Y, 1995. A method of combining multiple experts for the recognition of unconstraint handwritten numerals. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 17(1), 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Xu, A. Kryzak, and C.Y. Suen, “Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 22,no. 3, pp. 418–435, May/June 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho, T.K., Hull, J.J., Srihari, S.N., 1994. Decision combination in multiple classifier systems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 16(1), 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver C. and S. Quegan 1998. “Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images”. SciTech Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Serpico S.B., L. Bruzzone and F. Roli, 1996. “An experimental comparison of neural and statistical non-parametric algorithms for supervised classification of remote-sensing images,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 17(13), pp. 1331–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smits P.C., 2000. “On the concepts of relevance and sufficiency in feature subset selection.” In: Proceedings of the first workshop on Pattern Recognition in Remote Sensing. Andorra, Sept. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smits P.C., A. Annoni, 2000. “Cost-based feature subset selection for interactive image analysis,” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2000, Barcelona. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 386–389.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukunaga K. Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edition. New York: Academic, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rignot E. and R. Chellappa, 1993. “Maximum a posteriori classification of multifrequency, multilook, synthetic aperture radar intensity data,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 10,no. 4, pp. 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. The hyperspectral data set. Online. http://dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu/~biehl/MultiSpec/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smits, P.C. (2001). Combining Supervised Remote Sensing Image Classifiers Based on Individual Class Performances. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2096. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48219-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48219-9_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42284-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48219-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics