Abstract
To provide services to customers, the components of the international telecommunications system have to agree on joint activities and on the use of resources. In this paper we show how simple and clear models of interaction and behavior can be combined in a generic negotiation architecture able to automate the agreement reaching process between agents that, like in the global telecommunications system, have different preferences, policies and authority over resources and activities. At the basis of the architecture is an authority model of how agents can influence each other by setting obligations and interdictions upon their behavior. This ability is conferred to agents by their ownership over resources and activities. The architecture integrates a conversational component, enforcing and ensuring the well-formedness of the interaction, a representation of action formalizing agents’ authority to set obligations and interdictions upon other agents and a constraint optimization reasoning component allowing parties to deliberate over behaviors and outcomes to decide on their next move. We discuss in detail how this architecture is applied to dynamically negotiate the provisioning of communication services based on the detection and resolution of feature interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barbuceanu, M. and Fox, M. S. 1997. Integrating Communicative Action, Conversations and Decision Theory to Coordinate Agents. Proceedings of Automomous Agents’97, 47–58, Marina Del Rey, February 1997. 129
Barbuceanu, M. 1998. Agents that work in harmony by knowing and fulfilling their obligations. Proc. of AAAI-98, Madison, WI, 1998. 135
Barbuceanu, M. and Wai-Kao, L. 1999. Conversation Oriented Programming in COOL. M. Greaves and J. Bradshaw (eds.) Proceedings of Autonomous Agents’99 Workshop on Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Bellevue WA, May 1999. 134
Cameron, E. J., N. D. Griffeth, Y. J. Lin, M. E. Nilson, W. K. Schnure, and H. Velthuijsen. 1996. A Feature Interaction Benchmark for for IN and Beyond. In L. G. Bouma and H. Velthuijsen, editors, Feature Interactions in Telecommunication Systems, 1–23, Amsterdam, IOS Press. 130, 131
Finin, T. et al. 1992. Specification of the KQML Agent Communication Language. The DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative, External Interfaces Working Group. 129
Griffeth, N. and Velthuijsen, H. 1993. Win/win negotiation among autonomous agents. Proc. of 12th Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Hidden Valley, PA, 187–202. 131, 135
Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann. 136
Parsons, S., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N. 1998. Agents that Reason and Negotiate by Arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3), 261–292. 134
Selman, B., H. J. Levesque and D. Mitchell. 1992. A new method for solving hard satisfiability problems. Proc. AAAI-92 San Jose, CA, pp. 440446. 135
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Barbuceanu, M., Gray, T., Mankowski, S. (1999). Providing Telecommunication Services through Multi-agent Negotiation. In: Albayrak, S. (eds) Intelligent Agents for Telecommunication Applications. IATA 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1699. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48165-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48165-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66539-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48165-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive