Advertisement

A Study of the Impact of Network Loss and Burst Size on Video Streaming Quality and Acceptability

  • David Hands
  • Miles Wilkins
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1718)

Abstract

As multimedia IP services become more popular, commercial service providers are under pressure to maximise their utilisation of network resources whilst still providing a satisfactory service to the end users. The present work examines user opinions of quality and acceptability for video streaming material under different network performance conditions. Subjects provided quality and acceptability opinions for typical multimedia material presented under different network conditions. The subjective test showed that increasing loss levels results in poorer user opinions of both quality and acceptability. Critically, for a given percentage packet loss, the test found that increasing the packet burst size produced improved opinions of quality and acceptability. These results suggest that user-perceived Quality of Service can be improved under network congestion conditions by configuring the packet loss characteristics. Larger bursts of packet loss occurring infrequently may be preferable to more frequent smaller-sized bursts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ITU-T Rec. E.800: Terms and definition related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. Geneva (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fluckiger, F.: Understanding networked multimedia. London: Prentice Hall (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson, A., Sasse, M.A.: Evaluating audio and video quality in low-cost multimedia conferencing systems. Interacting with Computers, 3 (1996) 255–275zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apteker, R,T., Fisher, J.A., Kisimov, V.S., Neishlos, H.: Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Multimedia, Fall, (1995) 32–40Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes, C.J, Ghanbari, M., Pearson, D., Seferidis, V., Xiong, X.: Modelling and subjective assessment of cell discard in ATM video. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2 (1993) 212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ingvaldsen, T., Klovning, E., Wilkins, M.: A study of delay factors in CSCW applications and their importance. Proc. of 5th workshop Interactive Distributed Multimedia Systems and Telecommunications Services, LNCS 1483, Springer (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gringeri, S., Khasnabish, B., Lewis, A., Shuaib, K., Egorov, R., Basch, B.: Transmission of MPEG-2 video streams over ATM. IEEE Multimedia, January–March, (1998) 58–71Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    ITU-R Rec. BT 500-7: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Geneva (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ITU-T Rec. P.800: Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. Geneva (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ITU-T Rec.P.920: Interactive test methods for audiovisual communications. Geneva (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    European Institute for Research and Strategic Studies in Telecommunications: http://www.eurescom.de/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Hands
    • 1
  • Miles Wilkins
    • 1
  1. 1.BT LaboratoriesMartlesham HeathIpswich, SuffolkUK

Personalised recommendations