Quality of Service Management for Teleteaching Applications Using the MPEG-4/DMIF

  • Gregor v. Bochmann
  • Zhen Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1718)


In the context of distributed multimedia applications involving multicast to a large number of users, a single quality of service level may not be appropriate for all participants. It is necessary to distribute part of the QoS management process and allow each user process to make certain QoS decisions based on its local context. In order to allow for different QoS options, we assume that each source provides, for each logical multimedia stream, several different stream variants, representing different choices of user-level QoS parameters. The paper presents the design of a teleteaching system which uses this paradigm for QoS negotiation, and explains how the Delivery Multimedia Integration Framework (DMIF) of MPEG-4 can be adapted as a session protocol for such an application. In fact, it appears that this DMIF protocol, which is now being extended by ISO (DMIF Version 2) to the context of multicasting, provides some general session management functions which are quite useful for many distributed multimedia applications using broadcasting.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    D. Hutchinson, G. Coulson, A. Campbell, G. Blair. “Quality of Service Management in Distributed Systems”, Network and Distributed Systems Management, page 273–303, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Gecsei, “Adaptation in Distributed Multimedia Systems”. IEEE Multimedia, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. v. Bochmann, A. Hafid, “Some Principles for Quality of Service Management”, Distributed Systems Engineering Journal, 4:16–27, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Hafid, G. v. Bochmann, “Quality of Service Adaptation in Distributed Multimedia Applications”, ACM Multimedia Multimedia Systems Journal, volume 6, issue 5, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Fischer, A. Hafid, G. v. Bochmann, H. d. Meer, “Cooperative Quality of Service Manaement for Multimedia Applications”, proceedings of the 4th IEEE Internatinal Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Ottawa, Canada, june 1997, pp. 303–310.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Fischer, M. v. Salem, G. v. Bochmann, “Application Design for Cooperative QoS Management”, proceedings of the IFIP 5th International Workshop on QoS (IWQoS’97), New York, May 1997, pp 191–194.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Hafid, S. Fischer, “A Multi-Agent Architecture for Cooperative Quality of Service Management”, Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Management of Multimedia Networks and Services (MMNS’97), Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Deering, “Host Extensions for IP Multicasting”, IETF RFC 1112.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Banerjea, M. Faloutsos, R. Pankaj, “Designing QoSMIC: A Quality of Service sensitive Multicast Internet protoCol”, IETF Internet Draft: draft-ietf-idmr-qosmic-00.txt.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Hou, H. Y. Tyan, B. Wang, “QoS Extension to CBT”, IETF Internet Draft: draft-houcbt-qos-00.txt.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    “Overview of MPEG-4 Standard”, (N2725),
  12. [12]
    “Information technology — very-low bit-rate audio-visual coding — Part 6: Delivery Multimedia Integration Framework (DMIF)”, (N2506),
  13. [13]
    “Information technology — very-low bit-rate audio-visual coding — Part 6: Delivery Multimedia Integration Framework (DMIF)”, (N2720),
  14. [14]
    Z. Yang, “A tele-teaching application with quality of service management”, MSc thesis, University of Ottawa, expected 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregor v. Bochmann
    • 1
  • Zhen Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Technology and EngineeringUniversity of OttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations