Generalised Fuzzy Aggregation Operators

  • M. Petrou
  • K. R. Sasikala
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1715)


Fuzzy logic offers the option to try to model the non-linearity of the functioning of the human brain when several pieces of evidence are combined to make an inference. In the proposed scheme a Fuzzy reasoning system includes a training stage during which the most appropriate aggregation operators are selected. To allow for different importance to be given to different pieces of evidence, the Fuzzy membership functions used are allowed to take values in a range [0,w], with w ≠ 1. Then the need arises for the generalization of the aggregetion operators to cope with such membership functions. In this paper we examine the properties of such generalised operators, that make them appropriate for use in Fuzzy reasoning.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bandemer, H. and Gottwald, S., Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Methods with Applications, Wiley, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloch, I., “Information Combination Operators for Data Fusion: A comparative review with classification,” IEEE transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 26(1), January 1996, pp. 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Combettes, P. L., “The foundations of set theoretic estimation, ” Proceedings of the IEEE, 81(2), 1993, pp. 182–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czogala, E. and Drewniak, J., “Associative monotic operations in fuzzy set theory, ” Fuzzy sets and systems, 12, 1984, pp. 249–269.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubois, D. and Prade, H., “A review of Fuzzy Set Aggregation Connectives, ” Information Sciences, 36, 1985, pp. 85–121.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klir, G. J. and Yuan, B., Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sasikala, K. R., Fuzzy Reasoning with Geographic Information System ­ An aid to decision­making, PhD thesis, School of Elec Eng, IT & Maths, University of Surrey,, Guildford GU2 5XH, U.K., September 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sasikala, K. R. and Petrou, M., “Generalised Fuzzy Aggregation in Estimating the Risk of Desertification of a burned forest”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, to appear, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yager, R. R., “Multiple objective decision making using fuzzy sets, ”International Journal of Man­Machine Studies, 9, 1977, pp. 375–382.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yager, R. R., “Concepts, Theory and Techniques, A new methodology for ordinal multi­objective decision based on fuzzy sets, ” Decision Science, 12, 1981, pp. 589–600.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yager, R. R., “A note on weighted queries in Information Retrieval Systems, ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(1), 1987, pp. 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yager, R. R., “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, ” IEEE transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18(1), 1988, pp. 183–190.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yager, R. R., “Connectives and Quantifiers in fuzzy sets, ” Fuzzy sets and systems, 40, 1991, pp. 39–75.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yager, R. R. and Kelman, A., “Fusion of Fuzzy Information with Considerations for Compatibility, Partial Aggregation, and Reinforcement, ” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 15(2), 1996, pp. 93–122.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Petrou
    • 1
  • K. R. Sasikala
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Electronic Engineering, Information Technology and MathematicsUniversity of SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations