# On Defining Proofs of Knowledge

Conference paper

First Online:

## Abstract

The notion of a “proof of knowledge,” suggested by Goldwasser, Micali and Rackoff, has been used in many works as a tool for the construction of cryptographic protocols and other schemes. Yet the commonly cited formalizations of this notion are unsatisfactory and in particular inadequate for some of the applications in which they are used. Consequently, new researchers keep getting misled by existing literature. The purpose of this paper is to indicate the source of these problems and suggest a definition which resolves them.

## Keywords

Interactive Function Input Graph Previous Definition Satisfying Assignment Common Input
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Download
to read the full conference paper text

## References

- 1.D. Beaver, and J. Feigenbaum, “Hiding Instances in Multioracle Queries,”
*Proc. of the 7th STACS*, 1990, pp. 37–48.Google Scholar - 2.M. Bellare, S. Micali and R. Ostrovsky, “The True Complexity of Statistical Zero-Knowledge,”
*Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing*, ACM (1990), pp. 494–502.Google Scholar - 3.G. Brassard, D. Chaum, and C. Crépeau, “Minimum Disclosure Proofs of knowledge,”
*JCSS*, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1988, pp. 156–189.MATHGoogle Scholar - 4.J. Boyar, C. Lund and R. Peralta, “On the Communication Complexity of Zero-Knowledge Proofs.” 1989.Google Scholar
- 5.G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, S. Laplante and C. Léger, “Computationally Convincing Proofs of Knowledge,”
*Proc. of the 8th STACS*, 1991.Google Scholar - 6.U. Feige, A. Fiat, and A. Shamir, “Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Identity”,
*Journal of Cryptology*, Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 77–94.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 7.U. Feige, and A. Shamir, “Witness Indistinguishability and Witness Hiding Protocols,”
*Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing*, ACM (1990), pp 416–426.Google Scholar - 8.Z. Galil, S. Haber, and M. Yung, “Symmetric Public-Key Encryption”,
*Advances in Cryptology — Crypto85 proceedings*, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 218, Springer-Verlag, 1986, pp. 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.M. Furer, O. Goldreich, Y. Mansour, M. Sipser, and S. Zachos, “On Completeness and Soundness in Interactive Proof Systems”,
*Advances in Computing Research: a research annual*, Vol. 5 (S. Micali, ed.), pp. 429–442, 1989.Google Scholar - 10.O. Goldreich, “A Uniform-Complexity Treatment of Encryption and Zero-Knowledge”,
*J. of Cryptology*, to appear.Google Scholar - 11.O. Goldreich, and H. Krawczyk, “On Sequential and Parallel Composition of Zero-Knowledge Protocols”,
*17th ICALP*, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 443, Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 268–282.Google Scholar - 12.O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson, “Proofs that Yields Nothing but Their Validity or All Languages in NP Have Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems”,
*JACM*, Vol. 38, No. 1, July 1991.Google Scholar - 13.O. Goldreich, and Y. Oren, “Definitions and Properties of Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems”, TR-610, Computer Science Dept., Technion, Haifa, Israel. Submitted to
*Jour of Cryptology*.Google Scholar - 14.S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff, “The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems”,
*SIAM J. on Computing*, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1989, pp. 186–208.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 15.S. Haber, “Multi-Party Cryptographic Computations: Techniques and Applications”, PhD Dissertation, Computer Science Dept., Columbia University, Nov. 1987.Google Scholar
- 16.Y. Oren, “On the Cunning Power of Cheating Verifiers: Some Observations about Zero-Knowledge Proofs,”
*Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science*, IEEE (1987), pp. 462–471.Google Scholar - 17.A. Shamir, “IP=PSPACE,”
*Proceedings of the 31st Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science*, IEEE (1990), pp. 11–15.Google Scholar - 18.M. Tompa and H. Woll, “Random Self-Reducibility and Zero-Knowledge Interactive Proofs of Possession of Information,” University of California (San Diego) Computer Science and Engineering Dept. Technical Report Number CS92-244 (June 1992). (Preliminary version in
*Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science*, IEEE (1987), pp. 472–482.)Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993