Skip to main content

Genetic Algorithm Optimisation of Part Placement Using a Connection-Based Coding Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2358))

Abstract

The problem of placing a number of specific shapes in order to minimise material waste is commonly encountered in the sheet metal, clothing and shoe-making industries. It is driven by the demand to find a layout of non-overlapping parts in a set area in order to maximise material utilisation. A corresponding problem is one of compaction, which is to minimise the area that a set number of shapes can be placed without overlapping. This paper presents a novel connectivity based approach to leather part compaction using the no-fit polygon (NFP). The NFP is computed using an image processing method as the boundary of the Minkowski sum, which is the convolution between two shapes at given orientations. These orientations along with shape order and placement selection constitute the chromosome structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bounsaythip C, Maouche S. and Neus M. (1995), Evolutionary search techniques: Application to automated lay-planning optimisation problem, IEEE international conference on Systems, Manufacturing and Cybernetics (SMC), Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 5, pp. 4497–4503.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dowsland, K. A. Dowsland, W. B. (1995), Solution approaches to irregular nesting problems, European Journal of Operations Research, 84, pp. 506–521. Elsevier.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Anand, S. McCord, C. Sharma, R. Balachander, T. (1999), An integrated machine vision based system for solving the non-convex cutting stock problem using genetic algorithms, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 396–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahng, A. (2000), Classical Floorplanning Harmful, International Symposium on Physical Design, Proceeding ACM/IEEE, pp. 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adamowicz M. and Albano A. (1976), Nesting two-dimensional shapes in rectangular modules, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke and Kendall G. (1999), Evaluation of two-dimensional bin packing using the no fit polygon, Computers and Industrial Engineering Conference, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cunninghame-Green, R. (1989), Geometry, shoemaking and the milk tray problem, New Scientist, Vol. 12, August, 1677, pp. 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh, P.K. (1993), A unified computational framework for Minkowski operations, Computer and graphics, 17(4), pp. 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennell, J.A. Dowsland, K.A. Dowsland, W.B. (2000), The irregular cutting-stock problem-a new procedure for deriving the no-fit polygon, Computers and operations research, Vol. 28, pp. 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clay P. and Crispin A. (2001), Automated lay-planning in leather manufacturing, 17th National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 2001, Cardiff, pp 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Berg, M. van Kreveld, M. Overmars, M. Schwarzkopf, O. (1998), Computational Geometry Algorithms and Applications 2nd Ed. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg, D. E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, Longman Inc. ISBN 0-020-15767-5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, M. (1996), An introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, ISBN 0-262-13316-4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clay P., Crispin A. and Crossley S. (2000), Comparative analysis of search methods as applied to shearographic fringe modelling, Proceeding of 13th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, June 2000, New Orleans, pp. 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mühlenbein, H. and Schlierkamp-Voosen, D. (1993), Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm, Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crispin, A., Clay, P., Taylor, G., Hackney, R., Bayes, T., Reedman, D. (2002). Genetic Algorithm Optimisation of Part Placement Using a Connection-Based Coding Method. In: Hendtlass, T., Ali, M. (eds) Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2358. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48035-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48035-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43781-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48035-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics