Skip to main content

An Empirical Assessment of Comprehension Fostering Features in an Intelligent Tutoring System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2363))

Abstract

This paper describes the design and evaluation of two features in an Intelligent Tutoring System designed to facilitate a deeper conceptual understanding of domain principles in conjunction with the development of procedural skills. The first feature described here relates to the timing of feedback. Some researchers have argued that immediate corrective feedback, as embodied in many cognitive tutors, can block the exercise of activities that may enable students to gain a deeper conceptual understanding of a domain. These include self-monitoring, error detection, and error correction skills. We compare an immediate feedback tutor with a tutor that allows students to reflect on problem solving outcomes, and engage in error detection and correction activities. The other feature reported here is a component of declarative instruction. We assess the use of Ex-ample Walkthroughs as a comprehension-fostering tool. Prior to procedural practice, Example Walkthroughs step students through the study of example problems and guide them to reflect on the reasoning involved in going from a problem statement to a solution. An evaluation has shown that the best learning outcomes were associated with a combination of immediate feedback and Example Walkthroughs. There are indications that a combination of lower cognitive load during procedural practice and a robust and accurate encoding of declarative concepts contributed to the observed outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, N.J: LEA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corbett, A. T., Anderson, J. R. (2001) Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. Proceedings of CHI 2001, ACM, 2001 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Hadley, W. (2001). Cognitive Tutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms. In Goodman, P. (Ed) Technology Enhanced Learning (235–263). Mahwah, NJ: LEA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hendry, D. G. and Green, T. R. G. (1994) Creating, comprehending, and explaining spreadsheets: a cognitive interpretation of what discretionary users think of the spreadsheet model. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 40(6), 1033–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, R. M., Fleischman, E. S. (2001). Cascade Explains and Informs the Utility of Fading Examples to Problems. Proceedings of the 23rd Conf. of the Cognitive Sc. Society (pp. 459–464). Mahwah, NJ: LEA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, A.Y. (1992) Using tutoring systems to study learning. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24(2, 205–212)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Merrill, D.C., Reiser, B.J., Merrill, S.K., and Landes, S. “Tutoring: Guided Learning by Doing”. Cognition and Instruction, 1995, 13(3). 315–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nardi, B. (1993). A Small Matter of Programming. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reif, F. & Allen, S. (1992). Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Maier, U. H. (2000). From studying examples to solving problems: Fading worked-out solution steps helps learning. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 393–398. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D.C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. J. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt, R.A., Bjork, R.A. (1992). new conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schooler, L. J. & Anderson, J. R. (1990). The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 702–708, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singley, M. K. & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Transfer of Cognitive Skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mathan, S.A., Koedinger, K.R. (2002). An Empirical Assessment of Comprehension Fostering Features in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2363. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43750-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47987-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics