Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from Applying the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide for Process Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2349))

Abstract

The systematic definition and management of requirements is becoming increasingly important in product development. Many software organizations are interested in improving their requirements engineering processes but they do not know where to begin. Sommerville et al. have developed a framework known as the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG) for incremental process improvement. We applied the REGPG in four Finnish organizations and evaluated its strengths and weaknesses. The most important strengths of the REGPG are that it raises personnel awareness of requirements engineering and it includes relevant requirements practices allowing organizations to select practical improvement actions. The main weakness of the REGPG is that it offers a very limited set of general process improvement guidelines. Therefore, organizations that want to develop their requirements engineering processes systematically need to support the use of the REGPG with other improvement frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davis, A. M., Hsia, P.: Giving Voice To Requirements Engineering. IEEE Software, Vol. 11, Issue 2 (1994) 12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fayad, M., Laitinen, M.,: Process Assessment Considered Wasteful, Communications of the ACM, Vol 40, No. 11, (1997) 125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Houdek, F., Pohl, K.,: Analyzing Requirements Engineering Processes: A Case Study, Proceedings of 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, (2000) 983–987

    Google Scholar 

  4. Information technology-Software process assessment-Part 7: Guide for use in process improvement, Technical report, ISO/IEC TR 15504-7:1998(E) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kauppinen, M., Kujala, S.,: B.: Assessing Requirements Engineering Processes with the REAIMS Model: Lessons Learned, Proceedings of 11th International Symposium of INCOSE, Melbourne (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McFeeley, B.: IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement. Handbook CMU/SEI-96-HB-001. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PE, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sawyer, P., Sommerville, I., Viller, S.: Capturing the Benefits of Requirements Engineering. IEEE Software, Vol. 16, Issue 2 (1999) 78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P.: Requirements Engineering-A Good Practice Guide. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kauppinen, M., Aaltio, T., Kujala, S. (2002). Lessons Learned from Applying the Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide for Process Improvement. In: Kontio, J., Conradi, R. (eds) Software Quality — ECSQ 2002. ECSQ 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47984-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47984-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43749-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47984-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics