Metadata and Cooperative Knowledge Management

  • Matthias Jarke
  • Ralf Klamma
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2348)


Cooperative knowledge management refers to the work practice or culture facet of information systems engineering; it plays a key role especially in engineering and consulting domains. However, in comparison to technology-centered and business-process-centered meta modeling approaches (exemplified by UML and ERP), this aspect has received significantly less attention in research and is much less mature in terms of international standardization. We claim that additional interdisciplinary research effort is needed in this direction, and discuss different points of attack, largely in terms of their implications for better metadata management and meta modeling.


Knowledge Management Work Practice Knowledge Creation Meta Modeling Information System Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Appelt, W.: WWW Based Collaboration with the BSCW System. Proc. SOFSEM’99, Milovy, Czech Republic, LNCS 1725 (1999), 66–78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avaro, O., Salembier, P.: MPEG-7 Systems: overview, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11,6(2001): 760–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein, P. A.: Generic model management-a database infrastructure for schema management. Proc. CoopIS 01, Trente, Italy, LNCS 2172, Springer 2001, 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernstein, P. A., Bergstraesser, T., Carlson, J., Pal, S., Sanders, P., Shutt, D.: Microsoft repository version 2 and the open information model. Inform. Systems 24,2 (1999):71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braunschweig, B., Jarke, M., Becks, A., Koller, J., Tresp, C: Designing standards for open simulation environments: a computer-supported use case approach. Proc. 9th Intl. Symposium on Systems Engineering (INCOSE 99), Brighton, UK, vol. 2, 69–76.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Data integration in data warehousing. Intl. J. Cooperative Information Systems, spring 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H.: Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Science, 32,5 (1986): 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhar, V. Data mining in finance: using counterfactuals to generate knowledge from organizational information systems. Information Systems 23,7 (1998): 423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dhraief, H., Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Wolpers, M.: Open Learning Repositories and Metadata Modeling, Proc. 1st Semantic Web Working Symposium, Stanford 2001, 495–514.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fendt, K.: Contextualizing content. In Knecht, M., v. Hammerstein, K. (eds.): Languages across the curriculum. National East Asian Language Ctr., Columbus, Oh 2001, 201–223.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghezzi, C, Nuseibeh, B., eds. Special Section on Managing Inconsistency in Software Development. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 24,11 (1998), and 25, 6 (1999).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greenspan, S.: Requirements modeling-a knowledge representation approach to software requirements definition. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Dept, Toronto 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grote, K., Klamma, R.: Media and Semantic Relations. Comparison of Individual and Organizational Knowledge Structures. Dagstuhl Seminar “Knowledge Management. An Interdisciplinary Approach”, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 09.07. 2000–14.07.2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gross, T., Specht, M. Awareness in context-aware information systems. Proc. Mensch & Computer 01, Bonn 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hollender, E., Klamma, R., Börner-Klein, D., Jarke, M. A comprehensive study environment for a Talmudic tractate., Dutch Studies by Foundation for Near Eastern Languages and Literatures (DS-NELL) (in print).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horrocks, I.: FaCT and iFaCT. Proc. International Workshop on Description Logics (DL’99), Linköping, Sweden, CEUR-WS 22, 133–135.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jarke, M., Bui, X. T., Carroll, J. M. Scenario management: an interdisciplinary approach. Requirements Eng. 3,3–4 (1998): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jarke, M., R. Gallersdörfer, M. A. Jeusfeld, M. Staudt and S. Eherer (1995). ConceptBase-a deductive object base for meta data management. Intell. Inform. S. 4,2 (1995): 167–192.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jarke, M., Klemke, R., Nick, A. Broker’s Lounge-an environment for multidimensional user-adaptive knowledge management. Proc. HICSS 34, Wailea, Hw, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jarke, M., List, T., Köller, J.: The challenge of process data warehousing. Proc. 26th Intl. Conf. Very Large Databases, Cairo 2000, 473–483.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jarke, M., Rose, T.: Managing the evolution of information systems. Proc. SIGMOD 1988, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jeusfeld, M.: Änderungskontrolle in deduktiven Objektbanken. DISKI 19, infix Publ. Bad Honnef, Germany, 1992 (Diss. Univ. Passau 1992).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jeusfeld, M., Johnen, U.: An executable meta model for re-engineering database schemas, Intl. J. Cooperative Information Systems 4,2–3 (1995): 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kelly, S., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M.: MetaEdit+-a fully configurable multi-user and multi-tool CASE and CAME environment. Proc. CAiSE 96, Heraklion, Greece, 1996, 1–21.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kethers, S.: Capturing, formalising, and analysing cooperation processes-a case study. Proc. ECIS 2002, Gdansk, Poland (to appear).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klamma, R., Jarke, M. Driving the organizational learning cycle: the case of computer-aided failure management. Proc. 6th ECIS Conf. (Aix-en-Provence 1998), 378–392.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klamma, R., Moog, P., Wulf, V.: How to start a company? The Virtual Entrepreneurship Lab (VEL) as a teaching aid and training instrument for potential startups (in German). Proc. G-Forum Jahreskonferenz, Lüneburg/Germany 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laudon, K.: From PCs to managerial workstations: organizational environment and management policy in the financial industry. In Jarke, M. (ed.): Managers, Micros, and Mainframes-Integrating Systems for End Users. John Wiley & Sons 1986.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mandl, H., Gerstenmaier, J. (ed.): Die Kluft zwischen Wissen und Handeln. Hogrefe 2000.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marquardt, W.; von Wedel, L.; Bayer, B.: Perspectives on lifecycle process modeling. Proc. Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design, AIChE Symposium Series 323, Vol. 96 (2000), 192–214.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    deMichelis, G., Dubois, E., Jarke, M., Matthes, F., Mylopoulos, J., Papazoglou, M., Schmidt, J.W., Woo, C, Yu, E. A three-faceted view of information systems: the challenge of change. Comm. ACM 41, 12(1998): 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Motschnig-Pitrik, R. An integrating view on the viewing abstraction — contexts and perspectives in software development. Journal of Systems Integration 5,1 (1995): 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mylopoulos, J. Information modeling in the time of the revolution. Information Systems 23,3–4 (1998): 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., Koubarakis, M.: Telos-a language for managing knowledge about information systems. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 8,4 (1990): 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nissen, H. W., Jarke, M. Repository support for multi-perspective requirements engineering. Information Systems 24,2 (1999), 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oberweis, A., Scherrer, G., Stucky, W.: INCOME/STAR-methodology and tools for the development of distributed information systems. Inform. Systems 19,8 (1994):643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    O’Leary, D. Knowledge management systems: converting and connecting. IEEE Intelligent Systems 1998(5):30–33.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Papazoglou, M. P., Schlageter, G. (eds.). Cooperative Information Systems: Trends and Directions. Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Plattner, H.: Customer relationship management. In Scheer, A.-W., Nüttgens, M. (eds.): Electronic Business Engineering Proc. WI 99, Saarbrücken), Physica 1999, 1–12.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Prinz, W. NESSIE: An Awareness Environment for Cooperative Settings. Proc. ECSCW’99: 6th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Copenhagen 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 391–410.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ramesh, B., Jarke, M.: Towards reference models for requirements traceability. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 27,1 (2001): 58–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Riecken, D. (Hrsg.): Special Issue on Personalization. Comm. ACM 43,8 (2000).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rolland, C: A comprehensive view of process engineering. Proc. CAiSE 98 (Pisa), 1–24.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley 1999.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schäfer, E., Becker, J.-D., Jarke, M. DB-Prism-integrated data warehouses and knowledge networks for bank controlling. Proc. 26th VLDB Conf, Cairo, Egypt, 715–718.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schäl, Th. Workflow management systems for process organizations. Springer 1996.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Scheer, A.-W. Business Process Engineering. Springer 1994.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Staab, S. Schnurr, H.-P., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16,1 (2001).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Staudt, M., Jarke, M.: View management support in advanced knowledge base servers. Intelligent Information Systems 15,3 (2000): 253–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sutcliffe, A., Maiden. N., Minocha, S., Manuel, D.:Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 24,12 (1998).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ulich, E. Arbeitspsychologie. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Pöschel 1992.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice — Learning, Meaning, and Identiy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Jarke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ralf Klamma
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer FITSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.Informatik VRWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations