Advertisement

Understanding and Modelling Business Processes with DEMO

  • Jan L. G. Dietz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1728)

Abstract

DEMO is a methodology for modeling, (re)designing and (re)engineering organizations. Its theoretical basis draws on three scientific sources of inspiration: Habermas’ Communicative Action Theory, Stamper’s Semiotic Ladder, and Bunge’s Ontology. The core notion is the OER-transaction, which is a recurrent pattern of communication and action. This notion serves as the universal (atomic) building block of business processes. Some fifty projects have been carried out with DEMO, of very different kinds and in various organizations. The succes factor has been the same for all these projects, namely the practical relevance of the concepts of DEMO, as well as their clear and precise definitions. The application of the methodology is illustrated taking two well known cases.

Keywords

Business Process Objective Action Object World Model Business Process Purchase Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Austin, J.L., How to do things with words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1962Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Searle, J.R., Speech Acts, an Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, 1969Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Habermas, J., Theorie des Kommunikatives Handelns, Erster Band, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1981Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flores, F.M., J.J. Ludlow, Doing and Speaking in the Office, in: Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, Pergamon, Oxford, 1980Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor, J.R., Rethinking the Theory of Organizational Communication: how to read an organization, Ablex, Norwood, N.J., 1993Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Auramäki, E. E. Lehtinen, K. Lyytinen, A Speech Act based Office Modeling Approach, ACM TOIS, vol. 6, no. 2, 1988Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medina-Mora, R., T. Winograd, R. Flores, F. Flores, The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on CSCW, ACM, New York, 1992Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dignum, F., J.L.G. Dietz, E. Verharen, H. Weigand, Communication Modeling — the Language/Action Perspective, Electronic Workshops in Computing, Springer, 1996, http://www.springer.co.nk/ewic/workshops/CM96/
  9. 9.
    Dignum, F., J.L.G. Dietz, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Communication Modeling, Computing Science Reports, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1997Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldkuhl, G., M. Lind, U. Seigerroth, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Communication Modeling, Department of Informatics, Jönköping International Business School, 1998Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietz, J.L.G., Modeling Business Processes for the Purpose of Redesign, in: Proc. IFIP TC8 Open Conference on BPR, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van der Rijst, N.B.J., V.E. van Reijswoud, Comparing Speech Act Based Modeling Approaches for the Purpose of Information Systems Development, in: Proc. of the Third European Conference on Information Systems, Athens, Greece, 1995Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dietz, J.L.G., J.B.F. Mulder, Realizing Strategic Reengineering Objectives with DEMO, in: Proc. International Symposium on Business Process Modeling, Springer-Verlag 1996Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lind, M., G. Goldkuhl, Reconstruction of Different Business Prosesses: A Theory and Method Driven Analysis, in: [Dignum, Dietz, 1997]Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stamper, R.K., Applied Semiotics, in: Proc. of the ICL/University of New Castle Seminar ‘Information’, New castle, 1993Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bunge, M.A., Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol.3, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1977MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bunge, M.A., Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol.4, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1979MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Searle, J.R., The Construction of Social Reality, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London, 1995Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Reijswoud, V.E., The Structure of Business Communication-Theory, Model and Application, Doctoral Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 199611Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Reijswoud, V.E., J.B.F. Mulder, J.L.G. Dietz, Speech Act Based Business Process and Information Modeling with DEMO, Information Systems Journal, 1999Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hammer, M., Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate’, Harvard Business Review, 1990Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yourdon, E., Modern Structured Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan L. G. Dietz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department ISSEDelft University of TechnologyAJ Delft

Personalised recommendations