Geodesic Active Contours Applied to Texture Feature Space

  • Chen Sagiv
  • Nir A. Sochen
  • Yehoshua Y. Zeevi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2106 book series (LNCS, volume 2106)


Gabor Analysis is frequently used for texture analysis and segmentation. Once the Gaborian feature space is generated it may be interpreted in various ways for image analysis and segmentation. Image segmentation can also be obtained via the application of “snakes” or active contour mechanism, which is usually used for gray-level images. In this study we apply the active contour method to the Gaborian feature space of images and obtain a method for texture segmentation. We cal- culate six localized features based on the Gabor transform of the image. These are the mean and variance of the localized frequency,orientation and intensity. This feature space is presented, via the Beltrami frame- work, as a Riemannian manifold. The stopping term, in the geodesic snakes mechanism, is derived from the metric of the features manifold. Experimental results obtained by application of the scheme to test images are presented.


Riemannian Manifold Feature Space Active Contour Gabor Wavelet Geodesic Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A.C. Bovik and M. Clark and W.S. Geisler “Multichannel Texture Analysis Using Localized Spatial Filters”, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 12(1), 1990, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Brodatz, Textures: A photographic album for Artists and Designers, New York, NY, Dover, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Caselles and R. Kimmel and G. Sapiro, “Geodesic Active Contours”, International Journal of Conputer Vision, 22(1), 1997, 61–97.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.G. Daugman, “Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensinal visual cortical filters”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 2(7), 1985, 1160–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Gabor ldTheory of communication” J. IEEE, 93, 1946, 429–459.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Kaas, A. Witkin and D. Terzopoulos, “Snakes: Active Contour Models”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 1988, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver, A. Tannenbaum and A. Yezzi, “Gradient Flows and Geometric Active Contour Models”,Proceedings ICCV’95, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995, 810–815.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Kimmel, R. Malladi and N. Sochen, “Images as Embedded Maps and Minimal Surfaces: Movies, Color, Texture, and Volumetric Medical Images”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 39(2), 2000, 111–129.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.S. Lee, “Image Representation using 2D Gabor-Wavelets”, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 18(10), 1996, 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L.M. Lorigo, O. Faugeras, W.E.L. Grimson, R. Keriven, R. Kikinis, “Segmentation of Bone in Clinical Knee MRI Using Texture-Based Geodesic Active Contours”, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 1998, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.S. Manjunath and W.Y. Ma, “Texture features browsing and retrieval of image data”, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 18(8), 1996, 837–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Marcelja, “Mathematical description of the response of simple cortical cells”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 70, 1980, 1297–1300.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Paragios and R. Deriche, “Geodesic Active Regions for Supervised Texture Segmentation”, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision, 1999, 22–25.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Porat and Y.Y. Zeevi, “The generalized Gabor scheme of image representation in biological and machine vision”, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 10(4), 1988, 452–468.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Porat and Y.Y. Zeevi, “Localized texture processing in vision: Analysis and synthesis in the gaborian space”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 36(1), 1989, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.J. Osher and J.A. Sethian, “Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations”, J of Computational Physics, 79, 1988, 12–49.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Sapiro, “Vector Valued Active Contours”, Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 680–685, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jayant Shah, “Riemannian Drums, Anisotropic Curve Evolution and Segmentation”, Proceedings of Scale-Space 1999., Eds. Nielsen, P. Johansen, O.F. Olsen, J. Weickert, Springer, 129–140.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Sochen, R. Kimmel and R. Malladi, “A general framework for low level vision”, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 7, (1998) 310–318.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Zibulski and Y.Y. Zeevi, “Analysis of multiwindow Gabor-type schemes by frame methods”, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 4, 1997, 188–221.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Sagiv
    • 1
  • Nir A. Sochen
    • 1
  • Yehoshua Y. Zeevi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsUniversity of Tel AvivRamat-Aviv, Tel-AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Electrical engineeringTechnion - Israel Institute of TechnologyTechnion City, HaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations