Skip to main content

Collaborative Hypothesis Testing Processes by Interactive Production Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Discovery Science (DS 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1721))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

We have developed an interactive production system architecture to simulate collaborative hypothesis testing processes, using the Wason’s 2-4-6 task. In interactively solving situations two systems find a target, conducting experiments alternately. In independently solving situations, each of two systems finds a target without interaction. If the performance in the former situations exceeds in the latter situations, we approve of “emergence”. The primary results obtained from computer simulations in which hypothesis testing strategies were controlled are: (1) generally speaking collaboration neither provided the benefits of interaction nor caused emergence when only the experimental space was shared. (2) As the different degree of strategies was larger, the benefits of interaction increased. (3) The benefits came from complementary effects of interaction. That is, disadvantage of one system that used an ineffective strategy was supplemented by the other system that used an advantageous strategy. In a few cases we approved of emergence, the complementary interaction of two systems brought a supplementary ability of disconfirmation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruner, J, Goodnow, J, & Austing, G. (1967). A study of thinking. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gorman, M., Gorman, M., Latta, M., & Cunningham, G. (1984). How disconfirmatory, confirmatory and combined strategies affect group problem solving. British journal of psychology, 75, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Okada, T., & Simon, H. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain, Cognitive Science, 21, 109–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laughlin, P., Shupe, E., & Magley, V. (1998). Effectiveness of Positive Hypothesis Testing for Cooperative Groups. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 73, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freedman, E. (1992). Scientific Induction: Individual versus Group Processes and Multiple Hypotheses. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of cognitive science society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wason, P. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 12, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Newstead, S., & Evans, J. (Eds.). (1995). Perspectives on Thinking and Reasoning. UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Platt, J. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146, 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1989). Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: strategy, structure, and content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miwa, K., & Okada, T. (1996). Effective heuristics for hypothesis testing: an empirical discussion using a computer simulation method. Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 11, 877–887.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miwa, K. (1999). Collaborative Hypothesis Testing Processes by Interactive Production Systems. In: Arikawa, S., Furukawa, K. (eds) Discovery Science. DS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1721. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46846-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46846-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66713-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46846-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics