Skip to main content

Maximising Expected Utility for Behaviour Arbitration

  • Conference paper
Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence (AI 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1747))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1225 Accesses

Abstract

Utility fusion is presented as an alternative means of action selection which ameliorates both the bottlenecks of centralised systems and the incoherence of distributed systems. In this approach, distributed behaviours indicate the utility of possible world states, along with their associated uncertainty. A centralised arbiter then combines these utilities and probabilities to determine a Pareto-optimal action based on the maximisation of expected utility. Utility theory provides a Bayesian framework for explicitly representing and reasoning about uncertainty within the action selection process. In addition, the construction of a utility map allows the arbiter to model and compensate for the dynamics of the system; experimental results verify that the resulting system provides significantly greater stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, R. Motor Schema-Based Mobile Robot Navigation. In International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 8(4), August 1989, pp. 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, J. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Borenstein, J. and Koren, Y. Potential Field Methods and Their Inherent Limitations for Mobile Robot Navigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks, R. A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot. In IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. RA-2, no. 1, pp. 14–23, April 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, R. Intelligence Without Reason, in proceedings of Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, pp. 569–595, August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durrant-Whyte, H. Integration, Coordination, and Control of Multi-Sensor Robot Systems (Ph.D.). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanayama, Y. and. Miyake, N. Trajectory Generation for Mobile Robots. In Proceedings of 3 rd International Symposium on Robotics Research, pp. 333–340, Gouvieux, France, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly, A An Intelligent Predictive Control Approach to the High-Speed Cross-Country Autonomous Navigation Problem (Ph.D.). Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-95-33, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langer, D., Rosenblatt, J., and Hebert, M. A Behavior-Based System For Off-Road Navigation. In IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 10(6), December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moravec, H. and Elfes, A High Resolution Map From Wide-Angle Sonar. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp.116–121, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsson, N. Shakey the Robot. SRI Tech. Note 323, Menlo Park, Calif., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Payton, D., Rosenblatt, I, Keirsey, D. Plan Guided Reaction. In IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 20(6), pp. 1370–1382, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pirjanian, P. The Notion of Optimality in Behavior-Based Robotics. To appear in Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rescher, N. Semantic foundations for the logic of preference. In The Logic of Decision and Action, N. Rescher (ed.), Pittsburgh, PA, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenblatt, J. The Distributed Architecture for Mobile Navigation. In Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9(2/3), April-September, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenblatt, J. Utility Fusion: Map-Based Planning in a Behavior-Based System, in Field and Service Robotics, Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenblatt, J. and Hendler, J. Architectures for Mobile Robot Control, in Advances in Computers 48, M. Zelkowitz, Ed., Academic Press, London, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saffiotti, A, Konolige, K., and Ruspini, E. A multivalued-logic approach to integrating planning and control. In Artificial Intelligence 76(1–2), pp. 481–526, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saffiotti, A The Uses of Fuzzy Logic in Autonomous Robotics: a catalogue raisonne, in Soft Computing 1(4):180–197, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shafer, S., Stentz, A, and Thorpe, C. An Architecture for Sensor Fusion in a Mobile Robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2002–2011, San Francisco, CA, April, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stentz, A The Focussed D* Algorithm for Real-Time Replanning. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yen, J., Pfluger, N. A Fuzzy Logic Based Robot Navigation System. Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rosenblatt, J.K. (1999). Maximising Expected Utility for Behaviour Arbitration. In: Foo, N. (eds) Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence. AI 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46695-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46695-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66822-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46695-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics