Skip to main content

Feasibility of Optimised Disjunctive Reasoning for Approximate Matching

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1747))

Abstract

Description logics are powerful knowledge representation systems providing well-founded and computationally tractable classification reasoning. However recognition of individuals as belonging to a concept based on some approximate match to a prototypical descriptor has been a recurring application issue as description logics support only strict subsumption reasoning. Expression of concepts as a disjunction of each possible combination of sufficient prototypical features has previously been infeasible due to computational cost. Recent optimisations have greatly improved disjunctive reasoning in description logic systems and this work explores whether these are sufficient to allow the heavy use of disjunction for approximate matching. The positive results obtained support further exploration of the representation proposed within real applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Baader, E. Franconi, B. Hollunder, B. Nebel, and H.-J. Profitlich. An empirical analysis of optimization techniques for terminological representation systems or: Making KRIS get a move on. In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-92), pages 270–281, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader and B. Hollunder. KRIS: Knowledge representation and inference system. SIGART Bulletin, 2(3):8–14, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franz Baader and Bernhard Hollunder. How to prefer more specific defaults in terminolog ical default logic. In Proc. of the 13th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93), pages 669–674, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. B. Baker. Intelligent Backtracking on Constraint Satisfaction Problems: Experimental and Theoretical Results. PhD thesis, University of Oregon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. I. Berman, H. H. Moore IV, and J. R. Wright. CLASSIC and PROSE stories: Enabling technologies for knowledge based systems. AT&T Technical Journal, pages 69–78, January/February 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Coupey and C. Fouquere. Extending conceptual definitions with default knowledge. Computational Intelligence, 13(2):258–299, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Davis, G. Logemann, and D. Loveland. A machine program for theorem proving. Communications of the ACM, 5:394–397, 1962.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. G. De Giacomo and M. Lenzerini. TBox and ABox reasoning in expressive description logics. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-96), pages 316–327, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Giunchiglia and R. Sebastiani. A SAT-based decision procedure for ALC. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-96), pages 304–314, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Heinsohn, D. Kudenko, B. Nebel, and H.J. Profitlich. An empirical analysis of termi nological representation systems In Proc. of the 10th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92), pages 676–773, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Hollunder. Algorithmic Foundations of Terminological Knowledge Representatin Systems. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Hollunder and W. Nutt. Subsumption algorithms for concept languages. In Proc. of the 9th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-90), pages 348–353, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Horrocks. Optimising Tableaux Decision Procedures for Description Logics. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Horrocks. Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-98), pages 636–647, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. Hustadt and R. A. Schmidt. On evaluating decision procedures for modal logic. In Proc. of the 15th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), volume 1, pages 202–207, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin Padgham. Defeasible inheritance: A lattice based approach. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 23(6–9):527–541, 1992. Special Issue on Semantic Nets.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin Padgham and Bernhard Nebel. Combining classification and non-monotonic inheritance reasoning: A first step. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Sytn. on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS-93), pages 132–141, 1993. LNAI 689.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin Padgham and Tingting Zhang. A terminological logic with defaults: A definition and an application. In Proc. of the 13th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93), volume 2, pages 662–668, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Rosch. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. M. Smullyan. First-Order Logic. Springer-Verlag, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg Berlin

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horrocks, I., Padgham, L., Thomson, L. (1999). Feasibility of Optimised Disjunctive Reasoning for Approximate Matching. In: Foo, N. (eds) Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence. AI 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46695-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46695-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66822-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46695-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics