Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Interactions of Autonomous Agents: Private and Global Views on Communication

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Models of Agents (ModelAge 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1760))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

In describing the interactions between agents we can take either a global view, where the set of all agents is seen as one big system, or a private view, where the system is identified with a single agent and the other agents form a part of the environment. Often a global view is taken to fix some protocols (like contract net) for all the possible social interactions between agents within the system. Privately the agents then have fixed reaction rules to respond to changes in the environment. In a sense the agents are no longer autonomous in that they always respond in a fixed way and their behaviour can be completely determined by other agents. In this paper we investigate the case where there might not be a (or one) fixed protocol for the social interaction and where the agents do not necessarily react in the same way to each message from other agents. We distinguish between the agents perception of the world and the “real” state of the world and show how these views can be related.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Boutilier. Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory. In Jon Doyle, Erik Sandewall and Pietro Torasso (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, proceedings of the fourth international conference, pages 75–86, 1994, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California. 107, 107

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Cohen and H. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, vol.42, pages 213–261, 1990. 107, 108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Cohen and H. Levesque. Teamwork Nous, vol.35, pages 487–512, 1991. 103

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Davis and R. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, vol.20, pages 63–109, 1983. 103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Dignum and H. Weigand. Communication and deontic logic. In R. Wieringa and R. Feenstra, editors, Information Systems, Correctness and Reusability, pages 242–260. World Scientific, Singapore, 1995. 110

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Dignum. Autonomous Agents and Social Norms. Submitted to ICMAS workshop on Norms, Obligations and Conventions. 108

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Dignum, J.-J.Ch. Meyer, R. Wieringa and R. Kuiper. A modal approach to intentions, commitments and obligations: intention plus commitment yields obligation. In M.A. Brown and J. Carmo (eds.) DEON’96 Workshop on deontic logic in computer science, pages 174–193, Lisbon, Jan. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Dignum and B. van Linder. Modelling Rational Agents in a Dynamic Environment: Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again. In J.L. Fiadeiro and P.-Y. Schobbens (eds.) ModelAge-96, pages 81–92, Sesimbra, Portugal, 1996. 105

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Dignum and B. van Linder. Modeling Social Agents: Communication as Action In J. Mueller, M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings (eds.) Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), pages 83–93, Budapest, Hungary, 1996. 105, 119

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984. 116

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Harel. First Order Dynamic Logic. LNCS 68 Springer, 1979. 106

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. W. van der Hoek, B. van Linder and J.-J.Ch. Meyer. A logic of capabilities. In Nerode and Matiyasevich, eds, Proceedings of LFCS’94, LNCS 813, pages 366–378, 1994. 106

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Jennings. Commitments and Conventions: The foundation of coordination in Multi-Agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 8(3), pages 223–250, 1993. 103, 108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. Johnson, P. O’Brien and M. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, pages 345–360, London, 1996. 109

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Kinny and M. Georgeff. Commitment and Effectiveness of Situated Agents. In Proceedings Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 82–88, Sydney, Australia, 1991. 108

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lang. Conditional Desires and Utilities-an alternative logical approach to qualitative decision theory. In W. Wahlster, editor, Proceedings of ECAI-96, pages 318–327, Budapest, Hungary, 1996, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 107, 107

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. van Linder, W. van der Hoek and J.-J.Ch. Meyer. Tests as Epistemic Updates. Pursuit of Knowledge. Technical Report, UU-CS-1994-08, Utrecht University, 1994. 106

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.-J.Ch. Meyer. A different approach to deontic logic. In Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol.29, pages 109–136, 1988. 119

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Muller. A cooperation model for autonomous agents. In J. Muller, M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings, eds, Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), pages 135–147, Budapest, Hungary, 1996. 103

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Noriega and C. Sierra. Towards layered Dialogical Agents In J. Muller, M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings, eds, Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), pages 69–82, Budapest, Hungary, 1996. 115

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Norman, N. Jennings, P. Faratin and E. Mamdani Designing and Implementing a Multi-Agent Architecture for business process management. In J. Mueller, M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings (eds.) Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), pages 149–162, Budapest, Hungary, 1996. 104, 104, 105, 109

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin Rules of Encounter MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1994. 107

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Sandu. Reasoning about collective goals. In J. Muller, M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings, eds, Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), pages 35–47, Budapest, Hungary, 1996. 103

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.R. Searle. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. 1969. 109

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Weigand, E. Verharen and F. Dignum. Interoperable Transactions in Business Models: A Structured Approach. In P. Constantopoulos, J. Mylopoulos and Y. Vassiliou, eds, Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 1080), pages 193–209, Springer, 1996. 110

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Wieringa, J.-J.Ch. Meyer and H. Weigand. Specifying dynamic and deontic integrity constraints. Data & knowledge engineering, vol.4, pages 157–189, 1989. 106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fac. of Maths. & Comp. Sc., Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    F. Dignum

Authors
  1. F. Dignum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, De Uithof, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  2. Institut d’Informatique, Rue Grandgagnage 21, 5000, Namur, Belgium

    Pierre-Yves Schobbens

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dignum, F. (1999). Social Interactions of Autonomous Agents: Private and Global Views on Communication. In: Meyer, JJ.C., Schobbens, PY. (eds) Formal Models of Agents. ModelAge 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1760. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46581-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46581-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67027-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46581-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation