Abstract
One of the most important tasks in data cleansing is to deduplicate records, which needs to compare records to determine their equivalence. However, existing comparison methods, such as Record Similarity, Equational Theory, implicitly assume that the values in all fields are known, and NULL values are treated as empty strings, which will result in a loss of correct duplicate records. In this paper, we solve this problem by proposing a simple yet efficient method, Dynamic Similarity, which dynamically adjusts the similarity for field with NULL value. Performance results on real and synthetic datasets show that Dynamic Similarity method can achieve more correct duplicate records and without introducing more false positives as compared with Record Similarity. Furthermore, the percentage of correct duplicate records obtained by Dynamic Similarity but not obtained by Record Similarity will increase if the number of fields with NULL values increases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Bitton and D. J. DeWitt. Duplicate record elimination in large data files. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, pages 8(2):255–265, 1983.
S. Chaudhuri and U. Dayal. An overview of data warehousing and olap technology. In ACM SIGMOD Record, page 26 (1), 1997.
M. Hernandez. A generalization of band joins and the merge/purge problem. Technical Report CUCS-005-1995, Columbia University, February 1996.
M. Hernandez and S. Stolfo. The merge/purge problem for large databases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Managemnet of Data, pages 127–138, May 1995.
M. L. Jarke, M. Vassiliou, and P. Vassiliadis. Fundamentals of data warehouses. Springer, 2000.
R. Kimball. Dealing with dirty data. DBMS online, September 1996. Available from http://www.dbmsmag.com/9609d14.html.
M. L. Lee, T. W. Ling, and W. L. Low. Intelliclean: A knowledge-based intelligent data cleaner. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 290–294, 2000.
M. L. Lee, H. J. Lu, T. W. Ling, and Y. T. Ko. Cleansing data for mining and warehousing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pages 751–760, 1999.
Infoshare Limited. Best value guide to data standardizing. InfoDB, July 1998. Available from http://www.infoshare.ltd.uk.
A. E. Monge and C. P. Elkan. An efficient domain-independent algorithm for detecting approximately duplicate database records. In Proceeding of the ACMSIGMOD Workshop on Research Issues on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Tucson, AZ, 1997.
A. Silberschatz, M. StoneBraker, and J. Ullman. Database research: Achievements and opportunities into the 21st century. In SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data), page 25(1):52, 1996.
T. F. Smith and M. S. Waterman. Identification of common molecular subsequences. Journal of Molecular Biology, pages 147:195–197, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, L., Yuan, S.S., Yang, Q.X., Peng, S. (2002). Dynamic Similarity for Fields with NULL Values. In: Kambayashi, Y., Winiwarter, W., Arikawa, M. (eds) Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2454. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46145-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46145-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44123-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46145-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive