Skip to main content

GeoCosm: A Semantics-Based Approach for Information Integration of Geospatial Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling for New Information Systems Technologies (ER 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2465))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Information integration implies access to distributed information sources without interfering with the autonomy of the underlying data sources. Integration of distributed geospatial data requires a mechanism for selecting the data sources and performing data processing operations on the selected sources efficiently. We describe a semantics-based information integration approach that uses a spatio-temporal semantic model to define the geospatial information content of the sources, employs a conflict resolution ontology to resolve semantic heterogeneity, and uses geospatial metadata to help the users evaluate usefulness of the available data sources. We show how the captured metadata can be used for efficient query planning. Based on our proposed approach, we are developing GeoCosm, a web-based prototype that would help integrate autonomous distributed heterogeneous geospatial data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. L. Ambite and C. A. Knoblock, “Flexible and Scalable Query Planning in Distributed and Heterogeneous Environments,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 3–10, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Bayardo, B. Bohrer, R. S. Brice, A. Cichocki, J. Fowler, A. Helal, V. Kashyap, T. Ksiezyk, G. Martin, M. H. Nodine, M. Rashid, M. Rusinkiewicz, R. Shea, C. Unnikrishnan, A. Unruh, and D. Woelk, “The InfoSleuth Project,” SIGMOD Conference, 543–545, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. R. Bradbury, V. R. Baker, A. P. Barros, M. E. Campana, K. A. Gray, C. T. Haan, D. H. Moreau, C. L. Paulson, S. S. Schwartz, L. Shabman, K. D. Thompson, and D. A. Woolhiser, Hydrologic Hazards Science at the US, Geological Survey Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FGDC, “Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata,”, vol. 2001, FGDC-STD-001-1998 ed National Spatial Data Infrastructure, http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/documents/standards/metadata/v2_0698.pdf, 1998.

  5. H. Garcia-Molina, Y. Papakonstantinou, D. Quass, A. Rajaraman, Y. Sagiv, J. D. Ullman, V. Vassalos, and J. Widom, “The TSIMMIS Approach to Mediation: Data Models and Languages,” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 117–132, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. R. Genesereth, A. M. Keller, and O. M. Duschka, “Infomaster: An Information Integration System,” in The ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Tucson, AZ, pp. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Gray, “Evolution of Data Management,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 38–46, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. A. Hearst, A. Y. Levy, C. Knoblock, S. Minton, and W. Cohen, “Information Integration,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 12–24, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Khatri, S. Ram, and R. T. Snodgrass, “ST-USM: Bridging the Semantic Gap with a Spatio-temporal Conceptual Model,” Time Center Technical Report TR-64 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Khatri, S. Ram, and R. T. Snodgrass, “Supporting User-defined Granularities and Indeterminacy in a Spatiotemporal Conceptual Model,” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Also available as Time Center Technical Report TR-55), 36 pages, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Kitajima, R. Masuoka, and F. Maruyama, “Integrating Information and Knowledge with Software Agents,” Fujitsu Science Technology, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 162–174, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. A. Knoblock, S. Minton, J. L. Ambte, N. Ashish, I. Muslea, A. G. Philpot, and S. Tejada, “The Ariadne Approach to Web-based Information Integration,” International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, Vol. forthcoming, 1–26, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. F. Noy and C. D. Hafner, “The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Survey and Comparative Review,” AI Magazine, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 53–74, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. OGIS, “OpenGIS Simple Feature Specification for SQL,” Open GIS Consortium, Inc. 99-049, May 5 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ram, “Intelligent Database Design using the Unifying Semantic Model,” Information and Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 191–206, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Ram, V. Khatri, Y. Hwang, and S. R. Yool, “Semantic modeling and decision support in hydrology,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 66, No. 10, pp. 1229–1239, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Ram, D. D. Zeng, V. Khatri, and L. Zhang, “Efficient and Scalable Query Planning in Distributed Open Environments,” in 11th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Rigaux, M. O. Scholl, and A. Voisard, Spatial Databases: With Application to GIS: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. S. Subrahmanian, S. Adali, A. Brink, R. Emery, J. J. Lu, A. Rajput, T. J. Rogers, R. Ross, and C. Ward, “HERMES: Heterogeneous Reasoning and Mediator System,”, vol. 2000 University of Maryland, http://www.cs.umd.edu//projects/hermes/publications/abstracts/hermes.html, 1997.

  20. K. Sycara and D. Zeng, “Coordination of Multiple Intelligent Software Agents,” International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2–3, pp. 1–15, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. W. van Roessel, “Design of a Spatial Data Structure using the Relational Normal Form,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 33–50, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Wiederhold, “Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 38–49, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ram, S., Khatri, V., Zhang, L., Zeng, D.D. (2002). GeoCosm: A Semantics-Based Approach for Information Integration of Geospatial Data. In: Arisawa, H., Kambayashi, Y., Kumar, V., Mayr, H.C., Hunt, I. (eds) Conceptual Modeling for New Information Systems Technologies. ER 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2465. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46140-X_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46140-X_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44122-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46140-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics