Skip to main content

Open Constraint Satisfaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2002 (CP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2470))

Abstract

Traditionally, constraint satisfaction has been applied in closed-world scenarios, where all choices and constraints are known from the beginning and fixed. With the Internet, many of the traditional CSP applications in resource allocation, scheduling and planning pose themselves in open-world settings, where choices and constraints are to be

discovered from different servers in a network. We examine how such a distributed setting affects changes the assumptions underlying most CSP algorithms, and show how solvers can be augmented with an information gathering component that allows open-world constraint satisfaction. We report on experiments that show strong performance of such methods over others where gathering information and solving the CSP are separated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Genesereth, M. R., Keller, A. M., Duschka, O.: “Infomaster: An Information Integration System”, Proceedings of 1997 ACM SIGMOD Conference, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marian Nodine, Jerry Fowler, Tomasz Ksiezyk, Brad Perry, Malcolm Taylor and Amy Unruh: Active Information Gathering in InfoSleuth. In International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 9:1/2, 2000, pp. 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jerry Fowler, Brad Perry, Marian Nodine, and Bruce Bargmeyer: Agent-Based Semantic Interoperability in InfoSleuth SIGMOD Record 28:1, March, 1999, pp. 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alon Y. Levy, Anand Rajaraman, Joann J. Ordille: “Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions,” Proceedings of the 22nd VLDB Conference, Bombay, India, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rita Cucchiara, Marco Gavanelli, Evelina Lamma, Paola Mello, Michela Milano, and Massimo Piccardi: “Constraint propagation and value acquisition: why we should do it interactively,” Proceedings of the 16th IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 468–477, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Cucchiara, E. Lamma, P. Mello, M. Milano: “Interactive Constraint Satisfaction, ”, Technical Report DEIS-LIA-97-00, University of Bologna, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christian Bessière: “Arc-Consistency in Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems,” Proceedings of the 9th National Conference of the AAAI, pp. 221–226, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sanjay Mittal and Brian Falkenhainer: “Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems,” Proceedings of the 8th National Conference of the AAAI, pp. 25–32, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Makoto Yokoo: ”Asynchronous Weak-commitment Search for Solving Large-Scale Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, p. 467, MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter M.D. Gray, Suzanne M. Embury, Kit Y. Hui, Graham J.L. Kemp: “The Evolving Role of Constraints in the Functional Data Model”, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 12, pp. 113–137, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monique Calisti, Boi Faltings, Santiago Macho-Gonzalez, Omar Belakhdar and Marc Torrens: “CCL: Expressions of Choice in Agent Communication,” Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000), Boston MA, USA., July, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Sheth and J. A. Larson: “Federated Database Systems,” ACM Computing Surveys 22(3), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Chawathe, H. Garcia Molina, J. Hammer, K. Ireland, Y. Papakostantinou, J. Ullman and J. Widom: The TSIMMIS project: Integration of heterogeneous information sources. In IPSJ Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. José Luis Ambite and Craig Knoblock: “Flexible and scalable cost-based query planning in mediators: A transformational approach,” Artificial Intelligence 118, pp. 115–161, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Keith Decker, Katia Sycara and Mike Williamson: ”Middle-Agents for the Internet,” Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, pp. 578–583.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sycara, K. “In-Context Information Management Through Adaptive Collaboration of Intelligent Agents.” In Intelligent Information Agents: Cooperative, Rational and Adaptive Information Gathering on the Internet. Matthias Klusch (Ed.), Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katia Sycara, Seth Widoff, Matthias Klusch and Jianguo Lu: ”LARKS: Dynamic Matchmaking Among Heterogeneous Software Agents in Cyberspace.” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 5, 173–203, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Budzik, S. Bradshaw, X. Fu, and K. Hammond: “Supporting Online Resource Discovery in the Context of Ongoing Tasks with Proactive Assistants,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56(1) Jan 2002, pp. 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. J. Rhodes and P. Maes: “Just-in-time information retrieval agents,” IBM Systems Journal 39, pp. 685–704, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Rossi, C. Petrie and V. Dhar: “On the equivalence of constraint satisfaction problems,” Proceedings of ECAI-90, pp. 550–556, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Stergiou and T. Walsh: “Encodings of Non-binary Constraint Satisfaction Problems,” Proceedings of AAAI-99, ppp. 163–168, AAAI Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Mamoulis and K. Stergiou: “Solving Non-binary CSPs Using the Hidden Variable Encoding,” Proccedings of CP 2001, LNCS 2239, Springer-Verlag, pp. 168–182, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Prosser: “Hybrid Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction Problems,” Computational Intellligence 9(3), pp. 268–299, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eugene Freuder and Paul Hubbe: ”Extracting Constraint Satisfaction Subproblems,“ Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 548–555, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. James C. Freanch and Allison L. Powell:Metrics for Evaluating Database Selection Techniques. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Faltings, B., Macho-Gonzalez, S. (2002). Open Constraint Satisfaction. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2002. CP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2470. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46135-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46135-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44120-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46135-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics