Skip to main content

On the Complexity of Plan Adaptation by Derivational Analogy in a Universal Classical Planning Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2416))

Abstract

In this paper we present an algorithm called DerUCP, which can be regarded as a general model for plan adaptation using Derivational Analogy. Using DerUCP, we show that previous results on the complexity of plan adaptation do not apply to Derivational Analogy. We also show that Derivational Analogy can potentially produce exponential reductions in the size of the search space generated by a planning system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Veloso, M., Carbonell, J.: Derivational analogy in PRODIGY: Automating case acquisition, Storage and Utilization. Machine Learning (1993) 249–278

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ihrig, L., Kambhampati, S.: Plan-space vs. State-space planning in reuse and replay. Technical report, Arizona State University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muñoz-Avila, H.: Case-Base Maintenance by Integrating Case Index Revision and Case Retention Policies in a Derivational Replay Framework. Computational Intelligence 17 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nebel, B., Koehler, J.: Plan reuse versus plan generation: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Artificial Intelligence 76 (1995) 427–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kambhampati, S., Srivastava, B.: Unifying Classical Planning Approaches. Technical report, Arizona State University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fikes, R., Hart, P., Nilsson, N.: Learning and executing generalized robot plans. Artificial Intelligence 3 (1972) 251–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carbonell, J.G.: Derivational analogy: A theory of reconstructive problem solving and expertise acquisition. Machine Learning (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhansali, S., IIarandi, M.T.: When (not) to Use Derivational Analogy: Lessons Learned Using APU. In Aha, D., ed.: Proceeding of AAAI-94 Workshop: Case-based Reasoning. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blumenthal, B., Porter, B.: Analysis and Empirical Studies of Derivational Analogy. Artificial Intelligence 67 (1994) 287–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finn, D., Slattery, S., Cunningham, P.: Modelling of Engineering Thermal Problems-An implementation using CBR with Derivational Analogy. In: Proceedings of EWCBR’93, Springer-Verlag (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ihrig, L., Kambhampati, S.: Derivation Replay for Partial-Order Planning. AAAI-1994 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muñoz-Avila, H., Weberskirch, F.: Planning for Manufacturing Workpieces by Storing, Indexing and Replaying Planning Decisions. Proc. 3rd Int. Conference on AI Planning Systems (AIPS-96) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muñoz-Avila, H., Paulokat, J., Wess, S.: Controlling Nonlinear Hierarchical Planning by Case Replay. In: Proceedings the 2nd European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR-94). (1994) 195–203

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bylander, T.: The Computational Complexity of Propositional STRIPS Planning. Artificial Intelligence 69 (1994) 165–204

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kambhampati, S.: Exploiting causal structure to control retrieval and refitting during plan reuse. Computational Intelligence 10 (1994) 213–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanks, S., Weld, D.S.: A Domain-Independent Algorithm for Plan Adaptation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2 (1995) 319–360

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korf, R.: Planning as Search: A Quantitative Approach. Artificial Intelligence 33 (1987) 65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Au, TC., Muñoz-Avila, H., Nau, D.S. (2002). On the Complexity of Plan Adaptation by Derivational Analogy in a Universal Classical Planning Framework. In: Craw, S., Preece, A. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. ECCBR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46119-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics