Abstract
Many eye-tracking studies have shown that visual attention patterns during diagram-based problem solving, measured by eye movements, reveal critical aspects of the problem solving process that traditional measures like solution time and accuracy cannot address. In our first experiment (n = 14), we use this method during the solution of a widely-studied high level reasoning problem, Duncker’s (1945) radiation problem, to show that differences in visual attention to a particular diagram feature corresponds with correctly solving the problem. We then extend these findings in a second experiment (n = 81) to evaluate cognitive sensitivity to perceptual changes in the diagram. We show that problem solvers are highly sensitive to the diagram structure, and that the shifts in attention that result from subtle perceptual changes in the diagram appear to have a dramatic positive effect on reasoning.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1996). Visual information and valid reasoning. In G. Allwein & J. Barwise (Eds.), Logical reasoning with diagrams (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barwise, J., & Hammer, E. (1996). Diagrams and the concept of logical system. In G. Allwein & J. Barwise (Eds.), Logical reasoning with diagrams (pp. 49–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, M. I. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4, 372–378.
Beveridge, M., & Parkins, E. (1987). Visual representation in analogical problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 15, 230–237.
Demarais, A. M. & Cohen, B. H. (1998). Evidence for image-scanning eye movements during transitive inference. Biological Psychology, 49, 229–247.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, Whole No. 270.
Epelboim, J. & Suppes, P. (1997). Eye movements during geometrical problem solving. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (p. 911). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gick, M. L. (1985). The effect of a diagram retrieval cue on spontaneous analogical transfer. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 460–466.
Gick, M. L. (1989). Two functions of diagrams in problem solving by analogy. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 215–231). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
Hegarty, M. (1992). The mechanics of comprehension and comprehension of mechanics. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 428–443). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hegarty, M. & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742.
Hodgson, T. L., Bajwa, A., Own, A. M., & Kennard, C. (2000). The strategic control of gaze direction in the tower of London task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 894–907.
Hunziker, H. W. (1970). Visuelle Informationsaufnahme und Intelligenz: Eine Untersuchung ueber die Augenfixationen beim Problemloesen. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie, 29, 165–171.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, R. E. (in press). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.
Lenhart, R. E. (1983). Conjugate lateral eye movements and problem solving ability: Or, where to look for the right answer. Psychophysiology, 20, 456.
Mayer, R. E. (1976). Comprehension as affected by structure of problem representation. Memory and Cognition, 4, 249–255.
Mayer, R. E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Nakano, A. (1971). Eye movements in relation to mental activity of problemsolving. Psychologia, 14, 200–207.
Pedone, R., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001). The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29, 214–221.
Richardson, D. C. & Spivey, M. J. (2000). Representation, space, and Hollywood Squares: Looking at things that aren’t there anymore. Cognition, 76, 269–295.
Rozenblit, L., Spivey, M., & Wojslawowicz, J. (in press). Mechanical reasoning about gear-and-belt diagrams: Do eye-movements predict performance? In B. Meyer (Ed.), Diagrams and spatial reasoning. Springer.
Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (in press). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research.
St. Julien, J. (1997). Explaining learning: The research trajectory of situated cognition and the implications of connectionism. In D. Kirshner & J. Wilson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. (pp.261–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wheatley, G. H. (1997). Reasoning with images in mathematical activity. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 281–297). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Young, M. F. & McNeese, M. D. (1995). Asituated cognition approach to problem solving. In P. Hancock & J. Flach (Eds.), Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems. (pp. 359–391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zhang, J. & Norman, D. O. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grant, E.R., Spivey, M.J. (2002). Guiding Attention Produces Inferences in Diagram-Based Problem Solving. In: Hegarty, M., Meyer, B., Narayanan, N.H. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46037-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46037-3_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43561-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46037-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive