Skip to main content

Performance of Evolutionary Approaches for Parallel Task Scheduling under Different Representations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Evolutionary Computing (EvoWorkshops 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2279))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Task scheduling is known to be NP-complete in its general form as well as in many restricted cases. Thus to find a near optimal solution in, at most, polynomial time different heuristics were proposed. The basic Grahamś task graph model [1] was extended to other list-based priority schedulers [2] where increased levels of communication overhead were included [3]. Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) have been used in the past to implement the allocation of the components (tasks) of a parallel program to processors [4], [5]. In this paper five evolutionary algorithms are compared. All of them use the conventional Single Crossover Per Couple (SCPC) approach but they differ in what is represented by the chromosome: processor dispatching priorities, tasks priority lists, or both priority policies described in a bipartite chromosome. Chromosome structure, genetic operators, experiments and results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Graham R. L.: Bounds on Multiprocessing Anomalies and Packing Algorithms. Proceedings of the AFIPS 1972 Spring Joint Computer Conference, pp 205–217, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adam T.L., Chandy K.M., and Dickson J.R., A comparison of list schedules for parallel processing systems. Communications of the ACM, 17:685–9, 1974.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kruatrachue B., Static task scheduling and grain paccking in parallel processing systems. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zomaya A., Genetic scheduling for parallel processor systems: Comparative studies and performance issues. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems. Vol. 10, No. 8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kidwell M.:Using Genetic Algorithms to Schedule Tasks on a Bus-based System. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp 368–374, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cena M., Crespo M., Gallard R.,: Transparent Remote Execution in LAHNOS by Means of a Neural Network Device. ACM Press, Operating Systems Review, Vol. 29, Nr. 1, pp 17–28, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ercal F.: Heuristic Approaches to Task Allocation for Parallel Computing. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flower J., Otto S., Salama M.: Optimal mapping of irregular finite element domains to parallel processors. Caltech C3P#292b, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al_Mouhamed M. and Al_Maasarani A., Performance evaluation of scheduling precedence-constrained on message-passing systems. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems. 5(12):1317–1322, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagchi S., Uckum S., Miyabe Y., Kawamura K.: Exploring Problem Specific Recombination Operators for Job Shop Scheduling. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp 10–17, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pinedo M.,: Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems. Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Esquivel S., Gatica C., Gallard R.: Conventional and Multirecombinative Evolutionary Algorithms for the Parallel Task Scheduling Problem, LNCS 2037: “Applications of Evolutionary Computing”, pp. 223–232, Springer, April 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bierwirth C., Mattfeld D., Kopfer H: On Permutation representations for Scheduling Problems, PPSN IV, Springer-Verlag. pp310–318, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esquivel, S., Gatica, C., Gallard, R. (2002). Performance of Evolutionary Approaches for Parallel Task Scheduling under Different Representations. In: Cagnoni, S., Gottlieb, J., Hart, E., Middendorf, M., Raidl, G.R. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computing. EvoWorkshops 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2279. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46004-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46004-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43432-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46004-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics