Advertisement

Coordination for Orchestration

  • Luis F. Andrade
  • Jose L. Fiadeiro
  • Joao Gouveia
  • Georgios Koutsoukos
  • Michael Wermelinger
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2315)

Abstract

Based on the identification of some shortcomings of object-oriented methodology and technology to address the challenges of supporting the engineering and deployment ofWeb Services, we suggest that alternative approaches can be found in what we call “coordination methodology and technologies”—a set of modelling primitives, design principles, design patterns, and analysis techniques that we have been developing for supporting the construction and evolution of complex software systems that need to operate in very volatile and dynamic environments.

Keywords

Design Pattern Modelling Primitive Check Account Business Interaction Coordination Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [3]
    R. Allen and D. Garlan, “A Formal Basis for Architectural Connectors”, ACM TOSEM, 6(3), 1997, 213–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [4]
    L.F. Andrade and J.L. Fiadeiro, “Interconnecting Objects via Contracts”, in UML’99—Beyond the Standard, R. France and B. Rumpe (eds), LNCS 1723, Springer Verlag 1999, 566–583.Google Scholar
  3. [5]
    L.F. Andrade and J.L. Fiadeiro, “Coordination Technologies for Managing Information System Evolution”, in Proc. CAISE’01, K. Dittrich, A. Geppert and M. Norrie (eds), LNCS 2068, Springer-Verlag 2001, 374–387.Google Scholar
  4. [6]
    G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh and I. Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [7]
    J.L. Fiadeiro and A. Lopes, “Algebraic Semantics of Coordination, or what is in a signature?”, in AMAST’98, A. Haeberer (ed), Springer-Verlag 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [8]
    D. Gelernter and N. Carriero, “Coordination Languages and their Significance”, Communications ACM 35, 2, pp. 97–107, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [9]
    J. Gouveia, G. Koutsoukos, L. Andrade and J. Fiadeiro, “Tool Support for Coordination-Based Software Evolution”, in Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems—TOOLS 38, W. Pree (ed), IEEE Computer Society Press 2001, 184–196.Google Scholar
  8. [10]
    S. Katz, “A Superimposition Control Construct for Distributed Systems”, ACM TOPLAS 15(2), 1993, 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [11]
    H. Kilov and J. Ross, Information Modeling: an Object-oriented Approach, Prentice-Hall 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [12]
    J. Kramer. “Configuration Programming—A Framework for the Development of Distributable Systems”, Proc. CompEuro’90, pp. 374–384, IEEE, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. [13]
    B. Meyer, “Applying Design by Contract”, IEEE Computer, Oct.1992, 40–51.Google Scholar
  12. [14]
    D. Notkin, D. Garlan, W. Griswold and K. Sullivan, “Adding Implicit Invocation to Languages: Three Approaches”, in Object Technologies for Advanced Software, S. Nishio and A. Yonezawa (editors), LNCS 742, Springer-Verlag 1993, 489–510.Google Scholar
  13. [15]
    C. Szyperski, Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, Addison Wesley 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis F. Andrade
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jose L. Fiadeiro
    • 1
    • 3
  • Joao Gouveia
    • 2
  • Georgios Koutsoukos
    • 2
  • Michael Wermelinger
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.ATX Software S.A.Linda-a-VelhaPortugal
  2. 2.OBLOG Software S.A.Linda-a-VelhaPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Informatics, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of LisbonLisboaPortugal
  4. 4.Dep. of Informatics, Fac. Sciences and TechnologyNew University of LisbonMonte da CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations