Advertisement

Coordination in a Reflective Architecture Description Language

  • Carlos E. Cuesta
  • Pablo de la Fuente
  • Manuel Barrio-Solórzano
  • Encarnación Beato
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2315)

Abstract

Software Architecture studies the structure of software systems, as described by Architecture Description Languages (Adls). When these capture structures of change, they are comparable to Coordination Languages. Previous work suggests that the combination with Reflection concepts renders a general framework for the description of such evolving structures. This paper describes a reflective Adl named PiLar designed to provide such a framework. It consists of a structural part, which describes the static skeleton, and a dynamic part, which defines patterns of change. The major novelty is the reification relationship, which structures a description in several meta-layers, such that the architecture is able to reason and act upon itself. The paper includes a complete PiLar example, to show the language’s use and some of its most relevant features. It describes a Tuple Space model, illustrating the analogy with existing Coordination Models. We conclude by emphasizing PiLar’s generality and applicability.

Keywords

Software Architecture Coordination Model Architecture Description Architecture Description Language Dynamic Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Robert Allen. A Formal Approach to Software Architecture. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, May 1997. Technical report CMU-CS-97-144.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farhad Arbab. The IWIM Model for Coordination of Concurrent Activities. In Paolo Ciancarini and Chris Hankin, editors, Coordination Languages and Models, volume 1061 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 24–56, Cesena, Italia, April 1996. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marco Bernardo, Paolo Ciancarini, and Lorenzo Donatiello. Detecting Architectural Mismatches in Process Algebraic Descriptions of Software Systems. In Second Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, August 2001. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlos Canal, Ernesto Pimentel, and José María Troya. Specification and Refinement of Dynamic Software Architectures. In Software Architecture, pages 107–126. Kluwer, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicholas Carriero and David Gelernter. How to Write Parallel Programs: a Guide to the Perplexed. ACM Computing Surveys, 21(3):323–357, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walter Cazzola, Andrea Savigni, Andrea Sosio, and Francesco Tisato. Architectural Reflection: Bridging the Gap Between a Running System and its Architectural Specification. In 6th Reengineering Forum (REF’98), pages 12–1–12–6. IEEE, March 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlos E. Cuesta, Pablo de la Fuente, Manuel Barrio-Solórzano, and Encarnación Beato. Dynamic Coordination Architecture through the use of Reflection. In 16th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC2001), pages 134–140, March 2001. ACM Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    David C. Luckham and James Vera. An Event-Based Architecture Definition Language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(9):717–734, September 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pattie Maes. Concepts and Experiments in Computational Reflection. In Norman Meyrowitz, editor, OOPSLA’87 Conference Proceedings, pages 147–155. ACM Press, December 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeff Magee and Jeff Kramer. Dynamic Structure in Software Architectures. Software Engineering Notes, 21(6):3–14, November 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robin Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robin Milner. Communicating and Mobile Systems: the Pi-Calculus. CUP, June 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos E. Cuesta
    • 1
  • Pablo de la Fuente
    • 1
  • Manuel Barrio-Solórzano
    • 1
  • Encarnación Beato
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad de ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Pontificia de SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations