Skip to main content

From Simulated Dialogues to Interactive Performances

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Systems and Applications II (ACAI 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2322))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 671 Accesses

Abstract

In this contribution, we argue in favor of a shift from applications with single presentation agents towards flexible performances given by a team of characters as a new presentation style. We will illustrate our approach by means of two subsequent versions of a test-bed called the “Inhabited Market Place” (IMP1 and IMP2). In IMP1, the attribute “flexible” refers to the system’s ability to adapt a presentation to the needs and preferences of a particular user. In IMP2, flexibility additionally refers to the user’s option of actively participating in a computer-based performance and influencing the behavior of the involved characters at runtime. While a plan-based approach has proven appropriate in both versions to automatically control the behavior of the agents, IMP2 calls for highly reactive and distributed behavior planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. André E. (1999). Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, Special Double Issue on Animated Interface Agents, Vol. 13, No. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. André, E., Rist, T., van Mulken, S., Klesen, M. and Baldes, S. (2000). The Automated Design of Believable Dialogues for Animated Presentation Teams. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents, 220–255, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cassell, J., C. Pelachaud, N. I. Badler, M. Steedman, B. Achorn, T. Becket, B. Douville, S. Prevost, and M. Stone. (1994). Animated conversation: Rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture and spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH’ 94 Proceedings), 28(4):413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Camphell, L., Vilhjalmsson, H. and Yan, H. (2000). The human conversation as a system framework: Designing embodied conversational agents. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents, 29–63, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Craig, S. D, B. Gholson, M. H. Garzon, X. Hu, W. Marks, P. Wiemer-Hastings, and Z. Lu. 1999. Auto Tutor and Otto Tudor. In AIED-Workshop on Animated and Personified Pedagogical Agents, 25–30. Le Mans, France.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greimers, A. and Courtes, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes-Roth, B., van Gent, R. and Huber, D. (1997). Acting in character. In: Trappl, R. and Petta, P. (eds.): Creating personalities for synthetic actors, 92–112. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Höök, K., Persson, P. and Sjölinder, M. (2000). Evaluating Users’ Experience of a Character-enhanced Information Space. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 13(3), 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huber, M. (1999). JAM: A BDI-theoretic mobile agent architecture. Proc. of the Third Conference on Autonomous Agents, 236–243. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnstone, K. (1989). IMPRO: Improvisation and the Theatre. Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klesen, M., Szatkowski, J. and Lehmann, N. (2001). A Dramatised Actant Model for Interactive Improvisational Plays. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 181–194, New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Machado, I., Paiva, A. and Prada, R. (2001). Is the Wolf Angry or... Just Hungry? In: Proc. of the Fifth Conference on Autonomous Agents, 370–376. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marsella, S.C., Johnson, W.L. and LaBore, C. (2000). Interactive Pedagogical Drama. In: Proc. of the Fourth Conference on Autonomous Agents, 301–308. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Mateas, M. (1997). An Oz-Centric Review of Interactive Drama and Believable Agents. Technical Report CMU-CS-97-156, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCrae, R. R., and John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Special Issue: The five-factor model: Issues and applications. Journal of Personality 60: 175–215, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehlmann, O., Landvogt, L., Jameson, A., Rist, T. and Schäfer, R. (1998). Einsatz Bayes’scher Netze zur Identifikation von Kundenwünschen im Internet. Künstliche Intelligenz 3(98):43–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Microsoft Agent: Software Development Kit (1999). Microsoft Press, Redmond Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prendinger, H. and Ishizuka, M. (2001). Social Role Awareness in Animated Agents. In: Proc. of the Fifth Conference on Autonomous Agents, 270–377. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spiegel-Verlag. (1993). SPIEGEL-Dokumentation: Auto, Verkehr und Umwelt. Hamburg: Augstein.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swartout, W., Hill, R., Gratch, J., Johnson, W.L., Kyriakakis, C., LaBore, C., Lindheim, R., Marsella, S., Miraglia, D., Moore, B., Morie, J., Rickel, J., Thiébaux, M., Tuch, L., Whitney, R. and Douglas, J. (2001). Toward the Holodeck: Integrating Graphics, Sound, Character and Story. In: Proc. of the Fifth Conference on Autonomous Agents, 409–416. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wahlster, W., Reithinger, N. and Blocher, A. (2001). SmartKom: Multimodal Kommunikation with a Life-Like Character. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech 2001, Vol. 3, 1547–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walker, M., Cahn, J. and S. J. Whittaker, S.J. (1997). Improving linguistic style: Social and affective bases for agent personality. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents’97, 96–105. Marina del Ray, Calif.: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. von Winterfeldt, D., and W. Edwards. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

André, E., Rist, T., Baldes, S. (2002). From Simulated Dialogues to Interactive Performances. In: Mařík, V., Štěpánková, O., Krautwurmová, H., Luck, M. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications II. ACAI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2322. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45982-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45982-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43377-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45982-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics