Skip to main content

Learning Collective Behaviour from Local Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2296))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a reasoning model for extracting collective behaviours in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) from regularities in interaction streams. Using reflexive structures to describe the actions and knowledge of the system, called views, we build chronicles that catch and register the actual situations related to events and actions occurrences. These chronicles are then intensionalised in order to extract regularities in a single autonomous agent’s behaviour, thus defining a local behaviour. We then propose to extend this model for extracting collective behaviours in MAS using machine learning algorithms. Finally, we try to show that this dynamic analysis of an agent’s runtime can lead to organisations in MAS.

This definition is not global like in [6]: it is a model of the world, made by the observer agent. As a consequence, two agents in the same MAS can define different models of organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Brassac and S. Pesty. De la coaction à la coopération. In Proc. JFIADSMA’ 96, pages 251–263. Hermes, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Chaib-draa, B. Moulin, R. Mandiau, and P. Millot. Trends in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6:35–66, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P.R. Cohen and H.J. Levesque. Intentions in communication, chapter Persistence, Intension and Commitment, pages 33–69. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Dousson, P. Gaborit, and M. Ghallab. Situation Recognition: representation and algorithms. In Proc. 13th IJCAI, pages 166–172, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Collective intention constitues a group. In Demazeau et al., editor, Proc. MAAMAW’01, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Epstein and L. Axtell. Growing Artificial Societies. Social Science from the Bottom Up. MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.J. Finger. Exploiting Constraints in Design Synthesis. PhD thesis, Stanford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Guessoum and J.P. Briot. From Active Objects to Autonomous Agents. IEEE Concurrency, 7(3):68–76, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Gurevich. Evolving Algebra Lipari Guide. In E. Börger, editor, Specification and Validation Methods, pages 9–36. Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Hewitt. The challenge of open systems. Byte, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Hexmoor, J. Lammens, G. Caicedo, and S.C. Shapiro. Behaviour based AI, cognitive processes, and emergent behaviors in autonomous agents. In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, pages 447–461, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Mccarthy and P.J. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4:463–502, 1969.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mcilraith. Explanatory Diagnosis: Conjecturing Actions to Explain Observations. In International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pages 167–177, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V.R. Pratt. Semantical considerations on Floyd-Hoare Logic. In Proc. 17th FOCS, pages 109–121. IEEE, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.R. Quinlan. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1:81–106, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Sabouret and J.P. Sansonnet. Automated Answers to Questions about a Running Process. In Proc. CommonSense 2001, pages 217–227, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.P. Sansonnet and E. Valencia. An Experimental Framework for Behavior Extraction over Communication Flows in Multi-Agent Sytems. In Proc. Agent2000 Workshop on Agent Communication, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Utgoff. An Improved Algorithm for Incremental Induction of Decision Trees. In Proc. 11th ICML, pages 318–325. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sabouret, N., Sansonnet, JP. (2002). Learning Collective Behaviour from Local Interactions. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Nawarecki, E. (eds) From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems. CEEMAS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2296. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45941-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45941-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43370-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45941-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics