Abstract
The time-energy uncertainty relation ΔT ΔE ≥ 1/2ħ (3.1) has been a controversial issue since the advent of quantum theory, with respect to appropriate formalisation, validity and possible meanings. Already the first formulations due to Bohr, Heisenberg, Pauli and Schrödinger are very different, as are the interpretations of the terms used. A comprehensive account of the development of this subject up to the 1980s is provided by a combination of the reviews of Jammer [1], Bauer and Mello [2], and Busch [3,4]. More recent reviews are concerned with different specific aspects of the subject: [5,6,7]. The purpose of this chapter is to show that different types of time energy uncertainty relation can indeed be deduced in specific contexts, but that there is no unique universal relation that could stand on equal footing with the position—momentum uncertainty relation. To this end, we will survey the various formulations of a time energy uncertainty relation, with a brief assessment of their validity, and along the way we will indicate some new developments that emerged since the 1990s (Sects. 3.3,3.4, and 3.6). In view of the existing reviews, references to older work will be restricted to a few key sources. A distinction of three aspects of time in quantum theory introduced in [3] will serve as a guide for a systematic classification of the different approaches (Sect. 3.2).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Jammer: The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York 1974)
M. Bauer, P.A. Mello: Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 111, 38 (1978)
P. Busch: Found. Phys. 20, 1 (1990)
P. Busch: Found. Phys. 20, 33 (1990)
J. Hilgevoord: Am. J. Phys. 64, 1451 (1996)
J. Hilgevoord: Am. J. Phys. 66, 396 (1998)
P. Pfeifer, J. Frohlich: Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 759 (1995)
W. Pauli: ‘Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik’. In: Handbuch der Physik, 2nd ed., Vol 24. ed. by H. Geiger, K. Scheel (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1933); English translation: General Principles of Quantum Mechanics(Springer-Verlag, New York 1980)
W. Heisenberg: Z. Phys. 69, 56 (1927)
P. Busch, M. Grabowski, P. Lahti: Operational Quantum Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1995, 21997)
Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm: Phys. Rev. 122, 1649 (1961)
Y. Aharonov, B. Reznik: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1368 (2000)
M. Moshinsky: Am. J. Phys. 44, 1037 (1976)
L. Mandelstam, I.G. Tamm: J. Phys. (USSR) 9, 249 (1945)
M. Grabowski: Lett. Math. Phys. 8, 455 (1984)
N. Bohr: Naturwissenschaften 16, 245 (1928); Nature Suppl., April 14 (1928) p. 580
E.P. Wigner: ‘On the time-energy uncertainty relation’. In: Aspects of Quantum Theory, ed. by A. Salam, E.P. Wigner (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1972) pp.237–247
A.D. Baute, R. Sala Mayato, J.P. Palao, J.G. Muga, I.L. Egusquiza: Phys. Rev. A 61, 022118 (2000)
J. Kijowski: Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 361 (1974)
J. Hilgevoord, J. Uffink: ‘The mathematical expression of the uncertainty principle’. In: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, ed. by A. van der Merwe et al (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1988) pp. 91–114
J. Uffink: Am. J. Phys. 61, 935 (1993)
P. Pfeifer: Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3365 (1993)
E.P. Wigner: Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 255 (1957)
H. Salecker, E.P. Wigner: Phys. Rev. 109, 571 (1957)
R.J. Adler, I.M. Nemenman, J.M. Overduin, D.I. Santiago: Phys. Lett. B 477, 424 (2000)
Y.J. Ng, H. van Dam: Phys. Lett. B 477, 429 (2000)
C.R. Leavens, W.R. McKinnon: Phys. Lett. A 194, 12 (1994)
Y. Japha, G. Kurizki: Phys. Rev. A 60, 1811 (1999)
V. Buzek, R. Derka, S. Massar: Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2207 (1999)
R. Josza, D.S. Abrams, J.P. Dowling, C.P. Williams: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2010 (2000)
P. Busch, P. Lahti: Ann. Physik (Leipzig) 47, 369 (1990)
J. Hilgevoord, J. Uffink: Found. Phys. 21, 323 (1991)
E.B. Davies: Quantum Theory of Open Systems (Academic Press, New York 1976)
M.D. Srinivas, R. Vijayalakshmi: Pramana 16, 173 (1981)
R. Werner: J. Math. Phys. 27, 793 (1986)
J.C. Garrison, J. Wong: J. Math. Phys. 11, 2242 (1970)
A. Galindo: Lett. Math. Phys. 8, 495 (1984)
P. Lahti, J.-P. Pellonpää: J. Math. Phys. 40, 4688 (1999); 41, 7352 (2000)
A. Holevo: Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1980)
N. Bohr: ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’. In: Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. by P.A. Schilpp (Open Court, LaSalle 1949) pp. 201–241
A.D. Baute, I.L. Egusquiza, J.G. Muga, R. Sala Mayato: Phys. Rev. A 61, 052111 (2000)
L.F. Cook: Am. J. Phys. 48, 142 (1980)
U. Hauser, W. Neuwirth, N. Thesen: Phys. Lett. A 49, 57 (1974)
G. Badurek, H. Rauch, D. Tuppinger: Phys. Rev. A 34, 2600 (1986)
P. Szriftgiser, D. GueryOdelin, M. Arndt, J. Dalibard: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4 (1996)
T. Hils, J. Felber, R. Gahler, W. Glaser, R. Golub, K. Habicht, P. Wille: Phys. Rev. A 58, 4784 (1998)
J.D. Franson: Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205 (1989)
J. Brendel, E. Mohlers, W. Martienssen: Europhys. Lett. 10, 575 (1992)
P.G. Kwiat, A.M. Steinberg, R.Y. Chiao: Phys. Rev. A 47, R2472 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Busch, P. (2002). The Time-Energy Uncertainty Relation. In: Muga, J.G., Mayato, R.S., Egusquiza, I.L. (eds) Time in Quantum Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 72. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45846-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45846-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43294-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45846-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive