Skip to main content

Bi-Immunity Separates Strong NP-Completeness Notions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 2002 (STACS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2285))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We prove that if for some ε > 0, NP contains a set that is DTIME(2)-bi-immune, then NP contains a set that is 2-Turing complete for NP (hence 3-truth-table complete) but not 1-truth-table complete for NP. Thus this hypothesis implies a strong separation of completeness notions for NP. Lutz and Mayordomo [LM96] and Ambos-Spies and Bentzien [ASB00] previously obtained the same consequence using strong hypotheses involving resource-bounded measure and/or category theory. Our hypothesis is weaker and involves no assumptions about stochastic properties of NP.

Work done while the author was at University at Buffalo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Ambos-Spies and L. Bentzien. Separating NP-completeness under strong hypotheses. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 61(3):335–361, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Ambos-Spies, A. Terwijn, and X. Zheng. Resource bounded randomness and weakly complete problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 172(1):195–207, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Balcázar, J. Diaz, and J. Gabarró. Structural Complexity II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Balcázar and U. Schöning. Bi-immune sets for complexity classes. Mathematical Systems Theory, 18(1):1–18, June 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Johnson and S. Kashdan. Lower bounds for selection in x+y and other multisets. Technical Report 183, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Ladner, N. Lynch, and A. Selman. A comparison of polynomial time reducibilities. Theoretical Computer Science, 1:103–123, 1975.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lutz and E. Mayordomo. Cook versus Karp-Levin: Separating completeness notions if NP is not small. Theoretical Computer Science, 164:141–163, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Longpré and P. Young. Cook reducibility is faster than Karp reducibility. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 41:389–401, 1990.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Pavan and A. Selman. Separation of NP-completeness notions. In 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 78–89, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Selman. Reductions on NP and P-selective sets. Theoretical Computer Science, 19:287–304, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Simon and J. Gill. Polynomial reducibilities and upward diagonalizations. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 186–194, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pavan, A., Selman, A.L. (2002). Bi-Immunity Separates Strong NP-Completeness Notions. In: Alt, H., Ferreira, A. (eds) STACS 2002. STACS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2285. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45841-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45841-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43283-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45841-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics