Skip to main content

Exploiting the Difference in Probability Calculation between Quantum and Probabilistic Computations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 428 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2509))

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to show that we can ex- ploit the difference in the probability calculation between quantum and probabilistic computations to claim the difference in their space efficien- cies. It is shown that, for each n, there is a finite language L which contains sentences of length up to O(n c+1) such that: (i) There is a one- way quantum finite automaton (qfa) of O(n c+4) states which recognizes L. (ii) However, if we try to simulate this qfa by a probabilistic finite au tomaton (pfa) using the same algorithm, then it needs Ω(n 2c+4) states. It should be noted that we do not prove real lower bounds for pfa’s but show that if pfa’s and qfa’s use exactly the same algorithm, then qfa’s need much less states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Ambainis and R. Freivalds, “1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations,” Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, 332–341, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Ablayev and A. Gainutdinova, “On the Lower Bounds for One-Way Quantum Automata”, Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 132–140, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Amano and K. Iwama, “Undecidability on Quantum Finite Automata”, Proceedings of the 31st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 368–375, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ambainis, A. Nayak, A. Ta-Shma and U. Vazirani, “Dense quantum coding and a lower bound for 1-way quantum automata”, Proceedings of the 31st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 376–383, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search,” Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 212–219, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Kushilevitz and N. Nisan, “Communication Complexity”, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Kondacs and J. Watrous, “On the power of quantum finite state automata,” Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, 66–75, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Nayak, “Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes”, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 369–376, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amano, M., Iwama, K., Raymond, R. (2002). Exploiting the Difference in Probability Calculation between Quantum and Probabilistic Computations. In: Unconventional Models of Computation. UMC 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2509. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45833-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45833-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44311-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45833-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics