Skip to main content

Extracting Conceptual Relationships from Specialized Documents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling — ER 2002 (ER 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2503))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 715 Accesses

Abstract

Conceptual modeling has been fundamental to the management of structured data. However, its value is increasingly being recognized for knowledge management in general. In trying to develop suitable conceptual models for unstructured information, issues such as the level of representation and complexity of processing techniques arise. Here, we investigate the use of a conceptual model that is simple enough to allow efficient automatic extraction from documents. Our model focused on the problem-solution relationship that is central to the analysis of scientific papers. It also consists of supporting relationships such as benefits and drawbacks, assumptions, methods, extensions, and claims. Our study considered two kinds of documents - scientific research papers and patents. We evaluated the utility of the approach by building a prototype system and our user evaluation shows promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, The Semantic Web. Scientific American (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weibel, S., Godby, J., Miller, E., R. Daniel, J.: OCLC/NCSA metadata workshop report. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. MARC: US MARC Standards. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. MUC-7: Proceedings of the 7th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7). (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Porter, M.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3) (1980) 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Inc. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sparck-Jones, K., Galliers, J.: Evaluating natural language processing systems: an analysis and review. New York: Springer (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hovy, E., Marcu, D.: Automated Text Summarization: Tutorial Notes. COLING-ACL’98, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Teufel, S., Moens, M.: Discourse-level argumentation in scientific articles: human and automatic annotation. In: ACL Workshop on Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jing, H., Barzilay, R., McKeown, K., Elhadad, M.: Summarization Evaluation Methods: Experiments and Analysis. In: AAAI Intelligent Text Summarization Workshop. (1998) 60–68

    Google Scholar 

  11. Overmyer, S., Lavoie, B. Rambow, O.: Conceptual Modeling through Linguistic Analysis Using LIDA. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2001). Volume Toronto, Canada. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maybury, M.: Tools for the Knowledge Analyst: An Information Superiority Visionary Demonstration. IEEE COMPSAC 98. 22nd Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Vienna, Austria. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. TREC-10: Proceedings of the 10th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-10). (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Embley, D., Campbell, D., Jiang, Y., Liddle, S., Lonsdale, D., Ng, Y., Smith, R.: Conceptual-Model-Based Data Extraction from Multiple-Record Web Pages. Data & Knowledge Engineering 31 (1999) 227–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Loh, S., Wives, L., de Oliveira, J.: Concept-Based Knowledge Discovery in Texts Extracted from the Web. SIGKDD Explorations 2:1 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aussenac-Gilles, N., Biébow, B. Szulman, S.: Corpus analysis for conceptual modelling. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Volume 51. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shum, S.B., Motta, E., Dominique, J.: ScholOnto: An Ontology-Based Digital Library Server for Research Documents and Discourse. International Journal on Digital Libraries 3(3) (2000) 237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rounds, W.: The relevance of computational complexity theory to natural language processing. MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hui, B., Yu, E. (2002). Extracting Conceptual Relationships from Specialized Documents. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds) Conceptual Modeling — ER 2002. ER 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45816-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45816-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44277-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45816-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics