Skip to main content

Trust Management and Whether to Delegate

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security Protocols (Security Protocols 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2467))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Trust Management systems use security credentials to determine whether action requests are authorized. This paper examines how they might be used in determining whether requests for delegation are safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Aura and C Ellison. Privacy and accountability in certificate systems. Technical Report HUT-TCS-A61, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory for Theoretical Computer Science, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Beth, M. Borcherding, and H. Klein. Valuation of trust in open networks. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, LNCS 875. Springer Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M Blaze et al. The keynote trust-management system version 2. September 1999. Internet Request For Comments 2704.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C Ellison et al. Spki certificate theory. September 1999. Internet Request for Comments: 2693.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.N. Foley, T.B. Quillinan, J.P. Morrison, D.A. Power, and J.J. Kennedy. Exploiting KeyNote in WebCom: Architecture neutral glue for trust management. In Proceedings of The Fifth Nordic Workshop on Secure IT Systems, Reykjavik, Iceland, Oct 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.K. Millen and R.N. Wright. Reasoning about trust and insurance in a public key infrastructure. In Computer Security Foundations Workshop. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John P. Morrison and David A. Power. Master promotion and client redirection in the webcom system. In PDPTA, Las Vegas USA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.P. Morrison, D.A. Power, and J.J. Kennedy. A Condensed Graphs Engine to Drive Metacomputing. Proceedings of the international conference on parallel and distributed processing techniques and applications (PDPTA’ 99), Las Vagas, Nevada, June 28-July 1, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.K. Reiter and S.G. Stubblebine. Authentication metric analysis and design. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2(2):138–158, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I Watson and F Marir. Case based reasoning review. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 9(4), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Zimmermann. The Official PGP Users Guide. MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Foley, S.N. (2002). Trust Management and Whether to Delegate. In: Christianson, B., Malcolm, J.A., Crispo, B., Roe, M. (eds) Security Protocols. Security Protocols 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2467. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45807-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45807-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44263-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45807-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics