Skip to main content

Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Navigation services communicate optimal routes to users by providing sequences of instructions for these routes. Each single instruction guides the wayfinder from one decision point to the next. The instructions are based on geometric data from the street network, which is typically the only dataset available. This paper addresses the question of enriching such wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. We propose measures to formally specify the landmark saliency of a feature. Values for these measures are subject to hypothesis tests in order to define and extract landmarks from datasets. The extracted landmarks are then integrated in the wayfinding instructions. A concrete example from the city of Vienna demonstrates the applicability and usefulness of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G., 1999. Spatial Abilities, Cognitive Maps, and Wayfinding—Bases for Individual Differences in Spatial Cognition and Behavior. In: Golledge, R. (Ed.), Wayfinding Behavior—Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 46–80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burnett, G., 1998. Turn Right at the King’s Head. Drivers’ Requirements for Route Guidance Information. Ph.D., Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett, G., Smith, D., and May, A., 2001. Supporting the Navigation Task: Characteristics of “Good” Landmarks. In: Hanson, M.A. (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics 2001, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deakin, A., 1996. Landmarks as Navigational Aids on Street Maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 23(1): 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., and Bertolo, L., 1999. Spatial Discourse and Navigation: An Analysis of Route Directions in the City of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13: 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Downs, R. and Stea, D., 1977. Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fellbaum, C. (Ed.), 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fontaine, S. and Denis, M., 1999. The Production of Route Instructions in Underground and Urban Environments. In: Freksa, C. and Mark, D. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1661. Springer, Berlin, pp. 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golledge, R., 1999. Human Wayfinding and Cognitive Maps. In: Golledge, R. (Ed.), Wayfinding Behavior—Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 5–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Golledge, R., 1993. Geographical Perspectives on Spatial Cognition. In: Gärling, T. And Golledge, R. (Eds.), Behaviour and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 16–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Haala, N. and Anders, K.-H., 1996. Fusion of 2D-GIS and Image Data for 3D Building Reconstruction. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XXXI(B3): 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Habel, C., 1988. Prozedurale Aspekte der Wegplanung und Wegbeschreibung. In: Schnelle, H. and Rickheit, G. (Eds.), Sprache in Mensch und Computer, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koch, K., 1999. Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models. Springer, Berlin, 333 pp.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuipers, B., 1978. Modeling Spatial Knowledge. Cognitive Science (2): 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Livatino, S. and Madsen, C., 2000. Acquisition and Recognition of Visual Landmarks for Autonomous Robot Navigation, International Symposium on Intelligent Robotic Systems, Reading, UK, pp. 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lovelace, K., Hegarty, M., and Montello, D., 1999. Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments. In: Freksa, C. and Mark, D. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1661. Springer, Berlin, pp. 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lynch, K., 1960. The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, 194 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maaβ, W. and Schmauks, D., 1998. MOSES: Ein Beispiel für die Modellierung r:aumlicher Leistungen durch ein Wegebeschreibungssystem. Zeitschrift für Semiotik, 20(1–2): 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mallot, H. and Allen, J., 2000. Computational Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merriam-Webster, 2001. Merriam-Websterrss Collegiate Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Metzger, W., 1936. Gesetze des Sehens. Senckenberg-Buch, VI. W. Kramer & Co., Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michon, P.-E. and Denis, M., 2001. When and Why are Visual Landmarks Used in Giving Directions? In: Montello, D. (Ed.), Spatial Information Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2205. Springer, Berlin, pp. 292–305.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicklas, D., Groβmann, M., Schwarz, T., Volz, S., and Mitschang, B., 2001. A Model-Based Open Architecture for Mobile, Spatially-Aware Applications. In: Jensen, C., M. Schneider, B. Seeger, and V. Tsotras (Eds.), Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2121. Springer, Berlin, pp. 117–135.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasko, M. and Gruber, M., 1996. Fusion of 2D GIS Data and Aerial Images for 3D Building Reconstruction. International Archives of Photo grammetry and Remote Sensing, XXXI(B3): 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pradhan, S., Brignone, C., Cui, J.-H., McReynolds, H., and Smith, M., 2001. Websigns: Hyperlinking Physical Locations to the Web. IEEE Computer Journal, 34(8): 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosch, E., 1978. Principles of Categorization. In: Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siegel, A. and White, S., 1975. The Development of Spatial Representations of Large-Scale Environments. In: Reese, H. (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 10. Academic Press, New York, pp. 9–55.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sorrows, M. and Hirtle, S., 1999. The Nature of Landmarks for Real and Electronic Spaces. In: Freksa, C. and Mark, D. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1661. Springer, Berlin, pp. 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Timpf, S. and Frank, A., 1997. Using Hierarchical Spatial Data Structures for Hierarchical Spatial Reasoning. In: Hirtle, S. and Frank, A. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 69–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B., Mallot, H., Schweizer, K., and Freksa, C., 1997. Spatial Cognition: The Role of Landmark, Route, and Survey Knowledge in Human and Robot Navigation. In: Jarke, M., Pasedach, K., and Pohl, K. (Eds.), Informatik’ 97. Springer, pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wertheimer, M., 1925. Über Gestalttheorie. Philosophische Zeitschrift für Forschung und Aussprache, 1: 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yeh, E., 1995. Toward Selecting and Recognizing Natural Landmarks. Yale Technical Report 9503, Center for Systems Science, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raubal, M., Winter, S. (2002). Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44253-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45799-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics