Skip to main content

A Temporal Description Logic for Reasoning over Conceptual Schemas and Queries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2424))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper introduces a new logical formalism, intended for temporal conceptual modelling, as a natural combination of the well-known description logic \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R} \)and point-based linear temporal logic with Since and Until.We define a query language (where queries are non-recursive Datalog programs and atoms are complex \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{U}\mathcal{S}} \) expressions) and investigate the problem of checking query containment under the constraints defined by \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{U}\mathcal{S}} \) conceptual schemas—i.e., \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{U}\mathcal{S}} \) knowledge bases—as well as the problems of schema satisfiability and logical implication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, L. Herr, and J. Van den Bussche. Temporal versus first-order logic to query temporal databases. In Proc. of the 15th ACMSIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Sym. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’96), pages 49–57, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Artale and E. Franconi. Reasoning with enhanced temporal entity-relationship models. In Proc. of the InternationalWorkshop on Spatio-Temporal Data Models and Languages. IEEE Computer Society Press, August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Artale and E. Franconi. Temporal ER modeling with description logics. In Proc. ofthe International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER’99). Springer-Verlag, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Artale and E. Franconi. A survey of temporal extensions of description logics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 30(1–4), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider, editors. Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Borgida and R. J. Brachman. Conceptual modelling with description logics. In Baader et al. [5].

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Borgida, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Description logics for databases. In Baader et al. [5].

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Calì D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. A formal framework for reasoning on UML class diagrams. In Proc. of the 13th Int. Sym. on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2002), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. On the decidability of query containment under constraints. In Proc. of the 17th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Sym. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’98), pages 149–158, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, and D. Nardi. Description logics for conceptual data modeling. In Chomicki and Saake [13].

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, and D. Nardi. Unifying class-based representation formalisms. J. of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:199–240, 1999.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Chomicki. Temporal query languages: a survey. In Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Temporal Logic (ICTL’94), pages 506–534, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Chomicki and G. Saake, editors. Logics for Databases and Information Systems. Kluwer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Chomicki and D. Toman. Temporal logic in information systems. In Chomicki and Saake [13], chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Franconi, F. Grandi, and F. Mandreoli. A semantic approach for schema evolution and versioning in object-oriented databases. In Proc. of the 1st International Conf. on Computational Logic (CL’2000), DOOD stream. Springer-Verlag, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Franconi and G. Ng. The ICOM tool for intelligent conceptual modelling. In Proc. of the 7th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation meets Databases (KRDB’2000), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Gabbay, A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev. Many-dimensional modal logics: theory and applications. Studies in Logic. Elsevier, 2002. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H Gregersen and J. S. Jensen. Temporal Entity-Relationship models-a survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(3):464–497, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. I. Hodkinson, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev. Decidable fragments of first-order temporal logics. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 106:85–134, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Jarke, C. Quix, D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, E. Franconi, S. Ligoudistiano, P. Vassiliadis, and Y. Vassiliou. Concept based design of data warehouses: The DWQ demonstrators. In 2000 ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conference on Management of Data, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Schild. Combining terminological logics with tense logic. In Proceedings of the 6th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA’93, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent, and E. Zimanyi. Modeling time from a conceptual perspective. In Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM98), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Sturm and F. Wolter. A tableau calculus for temporal description logic: the expanding domain case. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2002. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. van Emde Boas. The convenience of tiling. Technical Report CT-96-01, ILLC—Univ. ofAmsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Satisfiability problem in description logics with modal operators. In Proc. of the 6 th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pages 512–523, Trento, Italy, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Modal description logics: Modalizing roles. Fundamenta Informaticae, 39(4):411–438, 1999.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Multi-dimensional description logics. In Proc. of IJCAI’99, pages 104–109, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Temporalizing description logics. In D. Gabbay and M. de Rijke, editors, Frontiers of Combining Systems, pages 379–401. Studies Press-Wiley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Artale, A., Franconi, E., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M. (2002). A Temporal Description Logic for Reasoning over Conceptual Schemas and Queries. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2424. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44190-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45757-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics